News Focus
News Focus
icon url

kund

07/26/25 2:50 PM

#495114 RE: boi568 #495111

If Anavex raises capital expecting that they will withdraw their MAA, they would open themselves up to a shareholder class action suit.


Quite an imagination! Misleading don't care about any lawsuits, he only cares about his pocket. Nasdaq is littered with scam baby biotechs — CEOs dilute the stock and release negative news the next day. A recent example is INMB.
icon url

12x

07/26/25 3:36 PM

#495121 RE: boi568 #495111

Wonder if this capital raise takes the MAA withdrawal option off the table.

Missling seems to have structured this as a win-win from a management perspective — with the only real drawback being the loss of the withdrawal option:

-Worst-case: Follow the Pridopidine playbook — take it all the way to CHMP refusal, but raise $150M in survival capital along the way (as done in 2021).
-Mid-case: Use the funds to run a confirmatory trial if conditional approval is granted.
-Best-case: Deploy the capital for go-to-market execution following full approval.

The speed/price at which the company taps this ATM will reveal how confident management really is in the MAA outcome.
icon url

frrol

07/26/25 8:53 PM

#495152 RE: boi568 #495111

Such a lawsuit would meet the same fate as the Rett suit. You're confirming a hope: shelf registration = no MAA withdrawal. Be wary of confirmation bias.

We have authorization for 200MM common shares, and only about 100MM used (o/s + warrants/options). There was about $100MM left under the old 2023 $150MM Lincoln Park purchase agreement. (Equal to about 9MM shares at recent prices plus discount). This new $150MM agreement with TD Cowen is explicitly at-the-market. It is effectively replacing the Lincoln Park agreement, which expires Feb 2026.