Danish Dude, Well said, and thanks for this useful advice. We all use and rely on tools for due diligence and connecting dots.
Your point about AI-generated quotes is crucial. We can all learn from this:
“When asking for quotes or verbatim quotes from ChatGPT, it more often that not, make a SUMMARY of the intentional meaning of the quote. Searching for the quote will not find it, because "behind the lines" the AI has made up its own quotes from perhaps 2-3 places of other quotes.”
This is another way to see the bigger picture:
Imagine a scientist making a presentation who used AI for a supporting reference. The core findings are sound and conclusions valid, but the AI tool created a paraphrased quote rather than a verbatim text. It's an honest mistake with a new technology that doesn't undermine the fundamental point.
The fundamental point is, NWBO’s clinical trial and medical science overwhelmingly supports DCVax-L approval. It is a question of when, not “if”. While timing will always be speculative, legitimate investor discussions contribute and collaboration benefits everyone.
Now contrast this with the modern day “snake oil salesman”, the Short manipulator type who responds to every genuine contributor’s post with deliberate FUD, sneering comments, and manufactured anger. Oh yeah, they will weaponize the minor error and ignore the fundamental point.
The key is recognizing the pattern: Who's contributing constructive analysis versus who's systematically trying to tear down legitimate discussion?
One group seeks truth despite imperfect tools. The other exploits imperfection to spread doubt and manipulate Retail’s investing sentiment.
Focus on the forest, not the individual leaves some people keep trying to set on fire.
Bullish
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
