Replies to post #45549 on Cyberlux Corp (CYBL)

[johnnyt5]

I definitely see that viewpoint, however I do not believe it was legal the way the so called "receiver" has tried to interfere with over 25 M from the Hill contract in a 1.5M case. A receiver is supposed to be a neutral third party, this one looks to be hell bent on hurting them. That recent document is very tersely written and desperate. The recent Cyberlux document looks composed and from a place of strength.

Also, the court has never officially put this receiver in charge, at least not over the company.

Cyberlux needs their final payment and then they can decide how to handle what appear to be at least some frivolous lawsuits. The momentum I am seeing strongly favors Cyberlux. The plaintiffs will likely try and negotiate a settlement once they realize they might lose the case.

[mick]

[-chart]www.stockscores.com/chart.asp?TickerSymbol=CYBL&TimeRange=1825&Interval=w&Volume=1&ChartType=CandleStick&Stockscores=1&ChartWidth=1100&ChartHeight=480&LogScale=&Band=&avgType1=&movAvg1=&avgType2=&movAvg2=&Indicator1=None&Indicator2=None&Indicator3=None&Indicator4=None&endDate=&CompareWith=&entryPrice=&stopLossPrice=&candles=redgreen[/chart]