Wednesday, July 16, 2025 8:57:49 AM
I definitely see that viewpoint, however I do not believe it was legal the way the so called "receiver" has tried to interfere with over 25 M from the Hill contract in a 1.5M case. A receiver is supposed to be a neutral third party, this one looks to be hell bent on hurting them. That recent document is very tersely written and desperate. The recent Cyberlux document looks composed and from a place of strength.
Also, the court has never officially put this receiver in charge, at least not over the company.
Cyberlux needs their final payment and then they can decide how to handle what appear to be at least some frivolous lawsuits. The momentum I am seeing strongly favors Cyberlux. The plaintiffs will likely try and negotiate a settlement once they realize they might lose the case.
Also, the court has never officially put this receiver in charge, at least not over the company.
Cyberlux needs their final payment and then they can decide how to handle what appear to be at least some frivolous lawsuits. The momentum I am seeing strongly favors Cyberlux. The plaintiffs will likely try and negotiate a settlement once they realize they might lose the case.
Bullish
Recent CYBL News
- Cyberlux Advances Execution on $20 Million Backlog with Next Delivery Milestones • ACCESS Newswire • 11/19/2025 06:05:00 PM
- Cyberlux Corporation Announces Operational Progress and Strategic Milestones in Q3 2025 • ACCESS Newswire • 11/15/2025 12:40:00 AM
- Cyberlux Corporation Unveils Next Phase of UAS Strategy to Address the Attritable Defense Industry Drone Market • ACCESS Newswire • 11/13/2025 07:25:00 PM
