Replies to post #219144 on Lightwave Logic Inc (LWLG)

[Lurker3]

Just look at his ‘ prediction’ on a lower share price due to the Russell deletion

Jeunke, how did your predictions pan out so far?

[WooptdooU]

Thanks, what is glaring is that Tan invested personally and NO lwlg insiders invest personally.... more proof of the GRIFTERS who run this stock (lwlg) selling apparatus.

[tedpeele]

He didn’t make money himself and decided not to hold shares.

Which saved me a ton of losses. Those that listened also saved huge losses. Those who didn’t are now suffering.

You and others who have been here a long time are not long-term investors. That’s pure self delusion. All of you are long-term gamblers. Do you not understand that yet? There are so many red flags here it’s almost comical. No true investor would touch this with a 10 foot pole because of the many red flags. This is a story stock for gamblers only.

Regarding the Russell deletion share price effect, I have been fairly noncommittal after initial thinking the effect would be negative. It will depend as I said months ago on various factors which may still be unfolding in the coming months.

[x993231]

Looks like you struck a nerve, 3 short sellers replied to your message.  The pressure is on because the price is not going their way and the cost to borrow went from almost nothing to over 10% oopsies for them.
X.

[tedpeele]

A week after I posted the initial red flag sticky the stock price plummeted and continued to plummet for months.

I will always believe that it opened eyes and caused selling as well as people from buying who would otherwise have been influenced by Proto’s phony and false narratives

I showed as the months went on the price of this stock compared with the NASDAQ., the Russell growth and value indexes, and AI and semiconductor indexes.

The contrast was striking.

I gave you guys a gift. Those that continued to scoff as the price crumbled and said it was just a coincidence had their chance. Those are the same ones that continue to criticize and throw false accusations. Some never learn.


..

[pitcook]

J22 In the illusion of being fair and honest, how can you criticize someone that has actually been mostly correct about the status of the GOO, and not be equally critical of hypers that have either been totally stupid, intellectually wrong, or paid to falsely hype the stock?

I am a long-long-long term shareholder (check posts on LWLG Yahoo, before the Xpert ruined it by being the Pumpkin before Pumpkin) and want nothing more than to see the first real signed contract. I am sick of fake news by a copy and pasting liar that for 10 years has been telling "newbies" that the science was 100% complete, and that any day for the last decade that it was
DEAL TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Even the former CEO fired for total malfeasance said more than a year ago that the Goo was not Through, and more science engineering/testing was needed. This back and forth has ruined this board to the point that the reason to be here, which is to learn about the science of the GOO, from those truly knowledgeable is over, as they quit posting on IHub.

Instead other self anointed Xperts want to blame the lack of any signed contracts, and low share-price on the false cause, the SHORTS. Posting multiple times a day, that the only reason you can't sell 1 share of the greatest future technology, to buy a pack of cheap chewing gum is the shorts. As many shares as I have, I wish I shorted the stock from $20 to this pitiful low price. They have been financially correct and made a fortune of profit.

Again this forum has been ruined by my side vs, their side back and forth stupid rhetoric. I still review it here, hoping to learn real updates etc., but please if you are as I believe you are, truly trying to factually educate new potential investors, be fair in conflating misinformation on both sides.