J22 In the illusion of being fair and honest, how can you criticize someone that has actually been mostly correct about the status of the GOO, and not be equally critical of hypers that have either been totally stupid, intellectually wrong, or paid to falsely hype the stock?
I am a long-long-long term shareholder (check posts on LWLG Yahoo, before the Xpert ruined it by being the Pumpkin before Pumpkin) and want nothing more than to see the first real signed contract. I am sick of fake news by a copy and pasting liar that for 10 years has been telling "newbies" that the science was 100% complete, and that any day for the last decade that it was
DEAL TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Even the former CEO fired for total malfeasance said more than a year ago that the Goo was not Through, and more science engineering/testing was needed. This back and forth has ruined this board to the point that the reason to be here, which is to learn about the science of the GOO, from those truly knowledgeable is over, as they quit posting on IHub.
Instead other self anointed Xperts want to blame the lack of any signed contracts, and low share-price on the false cause, the SHORTS. Posting multiple times a day, that the only reason you can't sell 1 share of the greatest future technology, to buy a pack of cheap chewing gum is the shorts. As many shares as I have, I wish I shorted the stock from $20 to this pitiful low price. They have been financially correct and made a fortune of profit.
Again this forum has been ruined by my side vs, their side back and forth stupid rhetoric. I still review it here, hoping to learn real updates etc., but please if you are as I believe you are, truly trying to factually educate new potential investors, be fair in conflating misinformation on both sides.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
