News Focus
News Focus
icon url

exwannabe

06/20/25 1:23 PM

#772307 RE: dstock07734 #772305

You are still pushing that colo-rectal trial that never launched?

You do know there are a dozen other trials that were announced by NWBO as ready to start (and several registered) and vanished. You should add them to your fantasy list.
icon url

Galzus Research

06/20/25 1:32 PM

#772312 RE: dstock07734 #772305

You have been bullshitting a lot, which only corroborate you are a fake Ph.D.



That's an interesting opinion. And even if my PhD were fake, it wouldn't change the facts as I've laid them out.

See this collaboration trial



No, I can't see it. You can't see it. No results have ever been published, and in the intervening 5 years since the study apparently ended there hasn't been an update, apparently.

do an extensive literature review



This is a good laugh coming from someone who has apparently not read about anything aside from DCVax.

For DCVax-L, the most important part is not about OS or PFS even though these are important measures. The most important part is whether it can trigger massive and sustainable t-cell infiltration into tumor sites of all types of solid tumors.



Oh really? That explains why the primary endpoint of their studies is "massive infiltration of T cells into the tumor."

Oh wait....

See the following figure?



Yeah, do you? Look at the size of those steps in the Kaplan-Meier curve. You didn't present the "at risk" patients, so it's not certain, but by my count you're looking at 6-10 patients in each arm. The fact that they calculated some nominal P value on that analysis is not very convincing.

Statistical significance =/= "my results are right." Do you even know what a P value is?

has no seminal understanding



You either have no idea what the word "seminal" means, or you're implying that I lack an understanding of semen. Might want to clarify for yourself before throwing around fancy-sounding words.