News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Investor2014

04/29/25 1:27 PM

#488879 RE: crescentmotor #488874

So you are criticising my approval assessment, while having proven getting your own wrong before.
icon url

boi568

04/29/25 1:42 PM

#488883 RE: crescentmotor #488874

By the numbers, it's much more likely we don't see a second clock stop because the EMA doesn't need one than because Anavex withdrew its application.
icon url

sab63090

04/29/25 2:51 PM

#488894 RE: crescentmotor #488874

Crescent
My heart is with you and also my position, but I cannot ignore Investor's caution...for a long time I have been thinking approval with a Phase 4 confirmatory trial....he understands the normal way.

My hopes are with the Peer Group endorsement who certainly are more informed than most, but also the OLE data...

This super soft trading seems to suggest that the shorts might be stepping into some mud at this point!

I picked up from that EMA process that at least the change is NOT to have a prolonged scrutiny, that a welcome change to this "process"