News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Its_TradingG

04/09/25 1:02 PM

#201256 RE: TJ24 #201255

TJ you've been on here for over a year talking about BioClonetics and getting your money back, its NOT happening you've been barking up this tree too long, it's not a winning argument. 
icon url

I-Glow

04/09/25 1:57 PM

#201257 RE: TJ24 #201255

Have you not been following the ENZC scam?

"I am simply pointing out to you that many of the current ENZC investors are people who invested into BioClonetics, and stayed invested after the merger between BioClonetics and ENZC, because BioClonetics had successfully tested its anti-HIV monoclonal antibody in some labs. These investors were hoping that ENZC-BioClonetics would go on to test the antibody on animals and then humans. These investors did NOT base their initial investments on nothing."

Show me which labs successfully tested anti-HIV monoclonal antibody in some labs?

And what do you consider successful?

If you go to clinicaltrials.gov - post a link to where ENZC-BioClonetics did any FDA approved clinical trials. That is what all real companies post their clinical trials - not some nonsense from Africa or Bulgaria.

Some of the pumpers were constantly posting that ENZC has a cure for HIV-AIDS which isn't true.

To be a successful investor you can't be as gullible as you. Below is a great example.

"Docsetc is trying to get some restitution for these cheated investors. Unfortunately, to get that restitution, he has to make Chandra and the Cotropias think that he is going to sue them. So, why are you trying to expose Docsetc? Why are you interfering in Docsetc's efforts to get restitution?"

Docsetc started talking about a lawsuit almost a year ago.

I have researched hundreds of lawsuits about OTC and it is very rarely successful. Docsetc has been dragging this lawsuit - first it was A Class Action Lawsuit - then it was a business fraud lawsuit and he has posted so much false and misleading information and investors like you believe every word.

Then you post this nonsense: "Unfortunately, to get that restitution, he has to make Chandra and the Cotropias think that he is going to sue them."

So now you admit it is a fake lawsuit.

And docsetc isn't going to scare anyone - Chandra was always part of the scam and docsetc was always posting talking to Chandra and he defended Chandra - so docsetc was a Chandra Pump.

And Cotropia is a Attorney - he is laughing at docsetc and his threats of a lawsuit.

Who is going to pay the law firm and those that pay aren't going to share the settlement with those that didn't pay - be prepared to be solicited for money to pay the still unnamed law firm.

Also it is so easy to file a law suit - docsetc could file a Pro Se' lawsuit to get things started and the mysterious Law Firm could come and file a Amended complaint.

IG
icon url

Its_TradingG

04/09/25 2:06 PM

#201258 RE: TJ24 #201255

"Unfortunately, to get that restitution, he has to make Chandra and the Cotropias think that he is going to sue them."
Have some integrity and character TJ. There's a right and a wrong way to do things. 
icon url

pumper_stumper

04/09/25 3:48 PM

#201263 RE: TJ24 #201255

"Now, since Chandra and the Cotropias took this monoclonal antibody out of ENZC and put this antibody into their new companies, we can conclude that there is a strong possibility that this antibody is valuable technology. "

This is insanity! They said nothing EVER about the drug, or can be shown that they did anything with it, in 4 years, so that means "we can conclude" it's valuable? This a wish, not a logical take based on company data or any company statements!

You haven't addressed what I asked. I am trying to show the huge holes in your due diligence and how the losses are your fault. You avoided most of my questions. You have shown NOTHING in my challenge to show any updates or discussing to this drug in the years ENZC owned it. The answer is ZERO correct? Then say so!

Do you agree that ENZC gave zero updates with progress or even concrete plans to go ahead with testing/phase 1 testing, and showed zero evidence that they did any more testing of any type. Yes or No? Simple question! If no, then post links to the statements they made showing progress or what data ENZC released.

We haven't even gotten started here. If you want me to show you what you missed, you need to address ALL of my questions or points, and be prepared to discuss them further. If you don't want to see or learn from your mistakes, and yes they are YOUR mistakes, just say so, and we'll end the discussion!