You saved me a lot of typing, as this would have been at least 2/3rd of my response. I'll wait until he addresses at least 2/3rd of your points
These are the questions that ANY REASONABLE investor should have answered themselves BEFORE investing. Let's see what he has to say. More like, let's see what he avoids answering, as they never like to be shown all the logical steps they missed. They fail to understand not having valid answers to these things is exactly why the 99% decline here is THEIR FAULT, not ENZCs!
After he responds the first thing I want to examine is what he believes his ability to understand and evaluate drug testing results (this will be fun), with detail of his evaluation. I expect to hear "the test data looks great, I don't need to say anything else."
Some highlights though that you point out:
"he has to make Chandra and the Cotropias think that he is going to sue them.""
How funny is it that I get blamed for standing in the way of a fake lawsuit. These losing investors used to love to talk about what a great lawyer C Cotropia is/was. Well does anyone really think that if I see this is a fake lawsuit, and even some ENZC investors can actually see this is a fake lawsuit, that Cotropia doesn't see this already? lol