Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Here is a hint - contact Bentham which became Omni Bridgeway.
Omni Bridgeway provides dispute and litigation finance from case inception to post-judgment enforcement and recovery across markets.
If the case is so great they will provide the funding so you don't have to solicit funds from shareholders.
Plus, there are many litigation funders - look around for the best deal.
IG
But you were pumping your ass off and Praising Chandra - now you are panhandling for donations to the fake lawsuit.
Why won't you name the Law firm?
IG
That's actually a good question. I like that.
Here's the answer. No. Since that call, I have not bought or sold a single share. I've also disclosed the full contents of that call to the attorneys. I was not given what would be called, 'privileged information' at that time. Only a promise that the ENZC control fight was not over and they were trying to come up with a shareholder resolution. Others he called also disclosed the same information to the attorneys. If that point is contested in any way, we'll all be testifying either on deposition or in court to every detail included in those phone calls.
You say you were watching, well that was declared before, by me, several, several times, right here on this board after he called. 11 others got the same call. Our call notes all match to a 'T'. Chandra does hold form, whether lying or just relaying info, but we just don't always know which. And, at that time, he had no Adnexus Biotech operations, just IP's landed in a shell company with no business or engaged operations for that short time. (Started it all up in mid-June.)
Insider information is the kind of stuff he told his private groups over on X, in calls that followed after, and chat rooms he operated in. I was not a party to those, but....
Well, you'll probably learn what else in the initial case filing. The fraud charges we can prove are pretty straight-forward and backed up by great evidence. This is thanks to a lot of great folks on this board, and even more on Twitter/X. Yes, I know full-well about his Discord group(s), but that's all I can say about that for now.
GLTY
So if you were called by him, wouldn't that be insider trading? Please clarify. You are the legal expert.
No twerp, I just needed to renew my PM membership here. And I only told folks to consider what Chandra said back in May of last year, everyone's decisions were their own.
I believe back then, you denied I was even called by him. Well, so much for you.
Do you need some funding to message people secret info? Like when you told everyone to hold when Chandra called you?
In a Class Action lawsuit shareholders never provide the funding.
"We're at a final stage of filing the case as either a Class Action or a direct Business Fraud case. Lawyers, if you've ever dealt with any on a civil matter, take you into a funding stage regardless of what payments are or are not involved for legal services."
A class action law firm pays for everything - but that take between 30-40% plus expensives.
You have been posting about the still unnamed law firm decides if it will be a Securities fraud lawsuit ot a Class Action lawsuit - and now it is the final decision between the two.
There hasn't been a Class Period defined.
I don't believe there is any real Class Action Law Firm that would take the case.
You pumped this garbage and now you are attempting to take more money from shareholders.
This absolutely not accurate it is more of your BS.
"In our case, there could be costs either way, so they're going to apprise us of all of our options, schedules and projected max totals should the case require billable hours to fund. Two of the firms have come forward after initial discovery and offered to take a business fraud case to completion, at a far lower rate than we expected. The Class Action could have initial costs, and all collected off the defendant at the end of the case, or it could have certification costs that are non-refundable."
There hasn't been any Discovery - Initial Discovery doesn't exist.
In a civil lawsuit, "discovery" is where both parties exchange information and evidence relevant to the case.
Both parties haven't exchanged information.
Your research can't be trusted because you were pumping an obvious scam.
IG
Big T, we're on it. My PM's here expired, I'll go buy more.
Well, kiddo, I'm on here and was in full support of ENZC from 2019 - 2022 when doubts began to pop up, got really concerned in mid-to-late 2023, when the SPAC nonsense and the PR's became an entirely different story increasing risks exponentially and after Chandra's explanations turn into deceitful dust last July, we (with other gents you don't know) began exposing as many facts as we could as to why we were now, not bashing, but pointing out hard facts against former ENZC principals with our angry perspectives today.
And as noted several times as you refuse to acknowledge, making you a liar by omission at best, we all acknowledged losing money on a pink is fine, but being swindled out in the open was not. When the SEC landed their lawsuit on Zhabilov's head, every shareholder had instant legal standing to sue these guys for a pretty wide variety of charges.
So, the less intelligent, like you, prefer to propagandize to folks still here, that it's better to watch criminal activity take your money away from you, freely of your own misplaced generosity, because there is no recourse. And when someone, anyone, stands up to try and help some folks, yes, myself included, it's a bad thing, we're "just bitching".
Your ignorance, or maybe assistance to those who may be defendants very soon, is unimpressive. This IS a dead ticker, no doubt about it, but it's also where I met a lot of folks who are interested in pursuing possible restitution. Might be a longshot, might be a more fluid a situation than you'll ever admit, and I don't care what your reasons are for your BEE ESS.
"We don't need...." ?? LMAO, you rarely participate here, go take a long jump...
A lot of us have met in person, we go over this stuff and help out. I'm not even the guy who started this effort. That guy gave up and left permamently. Two other alleged lawyers over in Twitter picked it up next, both backed out, one of whom is Chandra's biggest pimp now.
I'm betting you know that too, don't you?
And I also stated plainly I'm not a guy trying to save everyone either, can't ever make all things right again, but at least I try, and good luck trying to prove anything I've said here is false. A couple have tried, and their lack of knowledge on both the law and this entire situation was sorely lacking.
You want me to shut up? No, but I'd show you all I have, all we have, and where its going, if YOU EVER SHOW UP. But you won't,, you'll only come back here to complain, act tough, and disappear like the lying wuss you are.
GLTa
That would be nice, but what I got from him after he conversed with his accountants, he was not interested at all in being part of this legal matter.
He's welcome to join us, but I don't think he was interested. I am still in touch with MAGA and several others conversing on PM's, and we're reviewing the list now, because the attorneys want to know who all will be involved.
That has huge relevance when they press for restitution and how it would be handled, should we win the case. The initial filing has to declare who's been damaged, and who elected to be involved as plaintiffs. If this case goes the direct business fraud case route, there won't be the typical Class-Action signup process whereby you're usually notified by snail-mail plus email follow-up, one reason of many the website exists. If it goes Class Action, all former stockholders less those participating with Chandra inside-info, will have 2 opportunities to be included in the action.
We're keeping all developments in this matter out in the public view.
GLTA
It's simple boy....
We're at a final stage of filing the case as either a Class Action or a direct Business Fraud case. Lawyers, if you've ever dealt with any on a civil matter, take you into a funding stage regardless of what payments are or are not involved for legal services.
In our case, there could be costs either way, so they're going to apprise us of all of our options, schedules and projected max totals should the case require billable hours to fund. Two of the firms have come forward after initial discovery and offered to take a business fraud case to completion, at a far lower rate than we expected. The Class Action could have initial costs, and all collected off the defendant at the end of the case, or it could have certification costs that are non-refundable.
Also, depending on what type of case winds up getting filed, there are different options on refundable retainers to kick it all off. We have three meetings set over the next 6 days to wrap this up.
Everyone got that? Look it all up, typical case-intake all the way to verdict completion in business/civil matters in court and with legal representation. We're close now, so things on the preliminary filings are also close. Fireworks would begin thereafter, and we won't allow CCC's initiatives to get a gag-order in place, we'll be putting out constant updates. Some folks over on the dark side will be sorry they could never show any ounce of integrity.
GLTA
Coach said he made money here and feels badly for the people he misled ,he might chip in .
Can't wait to hear what the funding stage is about!
So the Law Firm isn't soliciting clients but you are and reporting to the Court - that is complete bullshit.
There isn't anyway 5 law firms wanted to be file a Class Action Lawsuit - ENZC doesn't have any assets to attach.
Here is the most important part of your post:
"NEWS: We're into the funding stage for this lawsuit."
In Class Action lawsuits don't require the shareholders to fund the lawsuit.
IG
The fake lawsuit keeps getting more outrageous - "The lawyers on the case against CCC are also asking us as well as their own paralegals, to closely monitor the SEC case, because it increased our standing significantly in going after the other 3 who got away."
Why won't you name the Law Firm that is doing a Class Action lawsuit against ENZC et el?
The SEC must not have had any proof that the 3 who got away were involved.
It didn't increase your standing significantly with the 3 who got away.
The most absurd part is the Law Firm is asking "us" whomever us is to monitor the SEC case.
I already know you don't understand securities law.
IG
No doubt. The lawyers on the case against CCC are also asking us as well as their own paralegals, to closely monitor the SEC case, because it increased our standing significantly in going after the other 3 who got away. First piece of advance evidence all the firms asked for, was a copy of the latest SEC case filings and developments.
If you find anything before we note it here or over on X, please shoot us an update. The team effort we have enjoyed has helped our group move this forward quite a bit.
NEWS: We're into the funding stage for this lawsuit. A few meetings to conduct yet with 2 different firms. We wound up with 5 firms interested in this case. One disengaged, One, was so busy it would take too long to file it, and that could come too close to statutes of limitations on 2 of the 5 fraud charges, so we disengaged from them. This left us with 3 firms, and 2 say they'll take the case now that initial discovery is over.
The one firm that disengaged initially wanted the case, but higher-ups with their Sr. Partners decided a case going after the party who defrauded shareholders was not a case type they wanted this year.
There are some legal cost-charges involved to move it forward without chance of the case stopping. So, we're discussing those now and preparing to move forward.
All this being said, the last 3 firms ask that I update the count of interested parties signing up, they'd like a pre-notice count should this case go the class-action route, or to designate final primary-plaintiff count should this take on the business-fraud case route. I'll explain that one later, as we don't plan on leaving anyone out who signed up, unless we discover a Chandra-pimp in the mix of our website sign-ups. (The last one category being legally disqualified from this case due to illegal insider participation with "Dr" Chandra.)
The website will be updated soon with more news. Sorry, this has not gone faster, but all of us over here also work full-time jobs and take care routine family duties as well.
GLTA
Feel free to scan it, there's no malware there. I've gone back and counted those who seem to be having this issue, and those who do not. So far, 272 sign-ups and 6 failures due to 'security warnings'. We're checking again, but Web.com, Network Solutions and EasyDmarc all show the site as super-safe.
That being said, we're getting a lot of hacker attempts on the site. That's attempts, not breaches, and we can only wonder who's been firing those off?
Sorry for your trouble. You can use the email link (use the gmail one showing on the site) and send me your info that the form asks for, and I'll sign you up manually.
Here in my company office, we have all sorts of security and website checking safety software scanning the websites we hit, and we're not getting that warning. I'd be happy to upload a video of that, if anyone doubts it.
Stay tuned.
This board has become nothing but trash talk, with everyone at each other’s throats. Meanwhile, the SEC case is still very much active, despite what some have claimed, and they’ve got the criminal Kelli Austin cornered. Things are getting interesting!
What gives you that idea?
So you don't want any facts posted...
So you don't want any facts posted - you only want the Bluesky smoke blowing pumping nonsense posted 247.
That is an excellent investment strategy.
IG
You are clueless about the US Legal system.
Nothing that the pumper docsetc has done is how a Class Action Lawsuit is legal.
No Class Action Law Firm is going to waste their time on ENZC.
Most of these clowns yammering about a lawsuit - still believe that ENZC has conducted FDA approved clinical trials which isn't true.
Are you going to prison for being part of the fake lawsuit?
After the SEC finishes their lawsuit - they will disgorge any money lift.
Docsetc can easily be discredited - because has was the little pumper boy like he has insiders contacts. He needs to be in prison.
IG
You were pumping this garbage not that long ago. Now let's all act "surprised" and "shocked"...wink wink.
Hello Dr Humorous!
Are YOU going to go away when the Lawsuit is real?
Simply Amazing... The concept of social media, stocks, money and the huge disconnect from reality.... coming to the conclusion that some one that took home 6 figures more than once through chatting and trading was some how taken....
Now that we OFFICIALLY know it's a scam with people that were paid to pump, you are still going with the old "paid bashers"? Exactly what the paid promoters brainwashed you with. Wake up pal.
I don't need the money it is a hobby.
No one would pay to have a sub-penny stock bashed.
You fell victim of a myth started in 2000 on another board.
The Paid Basher Myth was started in 2000 to make fun of unsophisticated OTC investors. I can't believe investors are still falling for this nonsense.
Confessions of a Paid Basher - The first version of the “Paid Basher Confession” was posted as a joke in November, 2000 to the Raging Bull message board by Steve Tracy, aka Firebird_1965.
By Tom Martin
aka "Steve Tracy"
aka "Firebird_1965"
Today I want to come clean about something I feel very badly about. I
cannot undo some of the things I have done, but hopefully this message will prevent other such occurrences in the future.
I am a paid basher.
Yes, it is true. Today is my last day at this company; I?m moving on to a new job. But before I go, I want to explain a few things because this just isn?t right and I won?t feel good about myself until I expose this sham. It?s hurt too many people and I don?t want it on my conscience anymore. I can no longer live with a lie.
I work for a company called Franklin, Andrews, Kramer & Edelstein in Stamford, CT. Basically, it?s a Boiler Room much like the one in the movie of the same name. The idea behind my group is to bash the price of a company's stock down low enough to where the group of investors who retained our company?s services can buy the stock really cheap and perhaps even take it over all together.
I hope you understood this - "I work for a company called Franklin, Andrews, Kramer & Edelstein"
That FAKE!8
There are approximately 70 people at the company divided into several
groups. My group, consisting of 5 people, is responsible for BIFS. While I probably shouldn't give any names of anyone working here now, what the heck, I'm leaving here, so what canthey do sue me?...
You don't know anything about a Class Action Lawsuit - you wrote - "The Class Action Lawsuit, which is not a bad idea on behalf of us commons, just to get Chandra on a lie detector during a public interview, would actually be a good thing. I'd like to know exactly how effective the current product lines are, and yes folks, they typically know before trials are formalized what the outcomes will be like, about 90%-plus of the time."
It is a civil lawsuit - you can't force Chandra to take a lie detector test - as they can't be used in Court.
Here is what happens: When a defendant is questioned under oath by the plaintiff's attorneys, it is called a "deposition" - the defendant is being "deposed" by the plaintiff's attorneys; this is a standard part of the discovery process in a lawsuit where both sides can ask questions of the opposing party to gather information before trial."
Why won't you name the Law firm - "The Class Action Lawsuit, which is not a bad idea on behalf of us commons, just to get Chandra on a lie detector during a public interview"
You are either fabricating information or don't know what you are posting.
IG
I find it humorous that anyone thinks that they can hang around a penny complaining indefinitely and then try to pretend they are not making money off of it.
No when I have a scam - I keep my foot on their throat until -management moves on - or the SEC suspends it.
If you believe in the fake lawsuit you deserve to lose your money.
Docsetc is clueless about how a class action lawsuit works. I don't believe it will be certified as a Class because of the SEC Lawsuit.
Why won't docsetc name the Law Firm - and why hasn't a complaint been filed in Federal Court?
Far too many red flags associated with the fake lawsuit - such as the law firm filing the Class Action lawsuit.
IG
Too much information to handle?
If the Lawsuit is real, will you go away forever?
Ok, for my one post... If the Lawsuit is real, will you go away forever?
Why are you sending the pumping clown docsetc any personal information?
It appears that no one including docsetc understands the legal system - especially class action lawsuits - why won't docsetc reveal the name of the Law Firm that is filing the Class Action lawsuit - that is a huge Red Flag.
Nothing about what docsetc is doing is the proper steps to take in a class action lawsuit.
First docsetc was pumping ENZC along with BonnieMac were pumping their asses off. And all they posted were lies.
BonnieMac
Wednesday, 03/29/2023 9:09:14 PM
$ENZC may be touching on cure for cancer also with its "novel" patents.
docsetc
Thursday, 04/06/2023 4:54:09 PM
Completely agree, and the interesting debate is the why that hasn't happened yet. But with this Africa-wide deployment of the HIV cure, it should be happening soon, even if there is an extension