We must have different definitions of drug test effectiveness test data published by ENZC.
Show me exactly what you deem to be published by ENZC regarding the above. Show me the ENZC PR referring to the resulting data from their tests of this promising drug/treatment. This should be viewed as beating a dead horse, because anyone should be able to know at this point that nothing that this scam company was "working on" has any progress or any chance of being an approved drug or treatment. (okay I said anyone, but likely docsetc still thinks there is great data backing it up) But, hey, I'll entertain it. Show me!
My god, your damn investment lost 90% (+60 cents to 4 cents) of its value even before the obviously scammy SAGA deal. That's not enough to show you that this was a scam? You still think there is legitimate published ENZC data supporting this but the rest of the medical world missed this, except you and your enzc comrads?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
