News Focus
News Focus
icon url

joeycav11

03/30/25 3:02 AM

#757243 RE: froggmister #757196

At the stage were at with approval it would be a let down for MHRA to approve Dcvax to be manufactured in clean rooms only.
And if you think about it Britain and MHRA would have never backed this new treatment if it was just another cell therapy treatment that was to expensive to provide to the population.
Britain is looking for a win here.. And thats being able to offer treatments to paying customers at 250 thou usd while subsidizing the cost that there citizens pay.
Nwbo and the British government have one chance at this announcement of approval
Heres my suggestion for the joint PR
This new cutting edge cancer treatment that Mhra has supported over the years is going to be approved at a suggested cost of 150 thou USD to our citizens. The cost to non citizens will be 250 thou
British citizens will be prioritized of course.
icon url

attilathehunt

03/31/25 11:00 AM

#757508 RE: froggmister #757196

Why send inspectors all over the world and significant expense to the UK taxpayer if you are going reject the application anyway?



I agree with everything you said, except for the above....UK taxpayers are not out anything. The MHRA charges the applicants for everything. And I mean everything.

A while ago, I posted a link to all the fees they charge...It was mind boggling...They charge for everything...except for toilet paper when using their restrooms.

I'll look for post to repost.
icon url

attilathehunt

03/31/25 11:11 AM

#757511 RE: froggmister #757196

Here is their fee schedule...

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mhra-fees/current-mhra-fees#:~:text=A%20fee%20will%20be%20payable,licences%20and%20authorisations%2C%20clinical%20trials


Section 13 is on Site visit fees....

Lot of the dilution, I am sure goes to pay for these fees.
icon url

learningcurve2020

03/31/25 11:16 AM

#757512 RE: froggmister #757196

All hearsay. We don’t know this as a fact.

>>Subsequent to that there have been numerous reports of extensive inspections. Why send inspectors all over the world and significant expense to the UK taxpayer if you are going reject the application anyway?