News Focus
News Focus
Followers 18
Posts 272
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/05/2005

Re: KRISGO post# 757192

Saturday, 03/29/2025 3:56:14 PM

Saturday, March 29, 2025 3:56:14 PM

Post# of 820800
Here's my two cents FWIW. The most credible reason to reject the DCVax-L application is the trial design which shifted from placebo controlled to contemporaneous matched external controls using External Control Populations (ECPs). Several prominent bears on this board disagree with the JAMA authors and signers who assert that with this design the trial "was associated with a clinically meaningful and statistically significant extension of overall survival in both nGBM and rGBM."

I would have expected that if the ECP design had been worthy of rejecting the application that would have occurred either A) upon application (they would have not accepted it) or B) after the first CHM meeting which occured in July. Subsequent to that there have been numerous reports of extensive inspections. Why send inspectors all over the world and significant expense to the UK taxpayer if you are going reject the application anyway?

Now, could there be a manufacturing issues that, despite many attempts going back and forth to remedy, cannot be solved? Maybe, but that seems highly unlikely to me. It's a complex treatment process, a complex application, and I believe it will be soon approved.
-Frogg
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News