Saturday, March 29, 2025 3:56:14 PM
Here's my two cents FWIW. The most credible reason to reject the DCVax-L application is the trial design which shifted from placebo controlled to contemporaneous matched external controls using External Control Populations (ECPs). Several prominent bears on this board disagree with the JAMA authors and signers who assert that with this design the trial "was associated with a clinically meaningful and statistically significant extension of overall survival in both nGBM and rGBM."
I would have expected that if the ECP design had been worthy of rejecting the application that would have occurred either A) upon application (they would have not accepted it) or B) after the first CHM meeting which occured in July. Subsequent to that there have been numerous reports of extensive inspections. Why send inspectors all over the world and significant expense to the UK taxpayer if you are going reject the application anyway?
Now, could there be a manufacturing issues that, despite many attempts going back and forth to remedy, cannot be solved? Maybe, but that seems highly unlikely to me. It's a complex treatment process, a complex application, and I believe it will be soon approved.
-Frogg
I would have expected that if the ECP design had been worthy of rejecting the application that would have occurred either A) upon application (they would have not accepted it) or B) after the first CHM meeting which occured in July. Subsequent to that there have been numerous reports of extensive inspections. Why send inspectors all over the world and significant expense to the UK taxpayer if you are going reject the application anyway?
Now, could there be a manufacturing issues that, despite many attempts going back and forth to remedy, cannot be solved? Maybe, but that seems highly unlikely to me. It's a complex treatment process, a complex application, and I believe it will be soon approved.
-Frogg
Recent NWBO News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/26/2025 05:15:34 AM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
