He doesn't read the court filings. He only reads the docket. From the docket's listed title of each court filing he comes to his 'clarity' with erroneous claims. He then demands his erroneous facts in conclusions that are plain wrong. It's weird.
Another Example: When his webpage showing the case docket had no more listings in March, he claimed that the XTI / Auctus case had been dismissed. Eventually I showed him the recorded oral hearing that occurred seven months later.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
