Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
STUPID IS, IS STUPID DOES...
like JohnnyDoesjohnnyDoesn't2024. The FAKER.
One of those very very stupid people who hate and disregard when another has a different approach, and makes a case well supported by FACTS.
You'll hop on board with SP2's bullshit for 'XERI' at a $1.00' but ignore the Xeriant $1,298,381,000 marketcap that goes with it... that will NEVER happen.
FACT!
hey, you could even go with Quester's who also makes up facts and provides crickets to support them.
the biggest cry baby here is you fckball. just look at all your posts. One whine after another.
.FACT!
Shut up crybaby bitch sell and go away loser
Only a COMPLETE IDIOT wouldn't believe this POS SCAM RUN BY LYING GRIFTERS won't drop below .01 in the VERY near future.
MASSIVE DILUTION to not only pay themselves for doing NOTHING but putting out FLUFF pr's. they also have to pay attorneys for doing NOTHING but pretending like they have a case and to ALSO, help kick that can futher down the road.
XERI Security Details WARNING. The 15 mil that was just added to the OS have already become UNRESTRICTED
Share Structure
Market Cap Market Cap 9,122,952 09/20/2024
Authorized Shares 5,000,000,000 09/20/2024
Outstanding Shares 570,184,486 09/20/2024
Restricted 205,401,718 09/20/2024
Unrestricted 364,782,768 09/20/2024
Share Structure
Market Cap Market Cap 10,953,244 09/13/2024
Authorized Shares 5,000,000,000 09/13/2024
Outstanding Shares 570,184,486 09/13/2024
Restricted 219,151,718 09/13/2024
Unrestricted 351,032,768 09/13/2024
LOLOLOLOL....
you CLEARLY HAVE ZERO KNOWLEDGE OF ANYTHING....
TRY READING IT AGAIN!
‘the agreement that plaintiff seeks to void’ does not ‘obligate the defendant to act as a dealer.’”
JUST MORE PATHETIC SHILL CRAP!!!
WRONG! The SDNY judge's decision did not account for the fact that a federal judge in another jurisdiction clearly determined that convertible notes are, in fact, a form of security.
ANOTHER 770K DILUTED TODAY...
THE END IS NEAR...
>.01 AND DEAD $...FOREVER!!!!!!!
That alone is reason to not invest in Xeriant.
That alone is reason to not invest in Xeriant
LOLOLOLOL....JUDGE WAS RIGHT USING THOSE 2 CASES AD PRECEDENT FOR xeri!!!
SO, JUST MORE PATHETIC PUMPING, FACT DENYING BS FROM you, AS PER USUAL, A KNOWN SHILL!!!
very true! great point.
was just reviewing those Serias A too and forgot to include in marketcap calculation.
Was noticing how those Series A Preferreds keep getting converted throughout each year. We can presume these newly minted XERI shares are then sold for cash on the open market. Owners, that's the (up to) three controlling majority owners, of Xeriant, Inc., keep using the company as their (ATM) cash generating personal income source. Fact!
Dilution Duffy will never let this run he will continue to bleed it down to .015 like he has done 20 times now.
As you yourself noted, the judges' decisions in those two prior SDNY cases failed to consider that the convertible notes were, in fact, a form of security -- as had been determined in cases in other jurisdictions. Therefore, XERI persuasively argued that the presiding judge in XERI/XTI case incorrectly relied on those cases as precedent.
You forgot to count the 723,895 Serie A shares, each convertible into 1000 shares of common stock.
So that gives 570.184.486 plus 723.895.000 = 1.298 .381.000 shares
So a market cap of 1.298.381.000$
Sure…
ONLY THING THAT'S "REAL", IS fluffy SCAMMED you!!!
Here's the "precedent" that the Judge already ruled on...SILLY PATHETIC PUMPER!!!
Two cases similar to Xeriant’s had been heard in the SDNY, in which companies called ExeLED Holdings Inc. and Vystar Corp tried to sue the toxic funders with whom they dealt. The Xerient appellate brief contends that the cases were not well-argued, and so the courts were never told that convertible notes were securities. Both companies lost, and both cases are now being cited as precedent for the district. When this case—the Xeriant case—was heard in the district court, the presiding judge noted that “‘the precedent in this district’ and rejected the claim because ‘the agreement that plaintiff seeks to void’ does not ‘obligate the defendant to act as a dealer.’”
https://www.securitieslawyer101.com/2024/xeriant-inc-fights-toxic-funder-auctus-fund-in-appellate-court/#:~:text=Xeriant%20alleged%20that%20when%20it,that%20transaction%20to%20be%20rescinded.
When NEXBOARD turns out to be real, suddenly your "facts" will be outweighed by reality.
Sounds like Duffy is BSing you regularly when you talk with him.
LOLOLOLOL...
you've BEEN SAYING "ACTUAL FACTS" FOR OVER 3 YEARS NOW.
FACTS ARE FACTS. OBVIOUS DILUTION SCAM RUN BY LYING GRIFTERS!!! THERE IS NO OTHER OR "ACTUAL" FACT THAN THAT ONE!!!
You have suspicions and assumptions. When the actual facts come out, they will prove you wrong. Based on the last press release, we probably won't have to wait too long.
SmartyBullshitPantsX2. XERI $1. LOL! a $570,184,486 marketcap?
Maybe and only after a massive reverse split will be $1
Lying skank pants.
DUMB**S SHILL PUMPER REPLIES WITH ZERO FACTS OF ANYTHING TO DEBUNK THIS IS NOTHING BUT A POS DILUTION SCAM!!!!!!!
Au contraire, Killa! It's just a matter of time before XERI's share price hits $1.00. Once they announce NEXBOARD certification and specific plans for mass production and commercialization, this stock will finally start living up to its potential.
ANOTHER 700K SHARES DILUTED TODAY. JUST A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE THIS POS SCAM RUN BY LYING GRIFTERS IS UNDER .01...FOREVER!!!!!!!
I'm sorry. Maybe if I posted in ALL BOLD CAPS your reading comprehension would improve to the point where you could explain things to Q. On the other hand, never mind...That would just be a case of the blind leading the blind.
you're NOT MAKING ANY SENSE AGAIN. GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD AND COME UP WITH SOMETHING BETTER NEXT TIME.
PATHETIC PUMPING MAMALUKE!!!
NOBODY LISTENS TO A KNOWN SHILL...
Appeals aren't granted just because the defendant doesn't like the verdict. They would need a good legal basis, and the SEC's recent victories over toxic lenders haven't been successfully appealed. In other words, Auctus is probably toast -- and will never see collect another penny from XERI as a result of its illegal activities. Not only that, but they will probably have to forfeit any ill-gotten gains (plus damages) when XERI wins its appeal based on the precedent established by SEC's impending victory in court.
Is that the best argument you can come up with? Calling myself "Smartypants" was hardly a boast. Just as calling yourself "Killazilla" wasn't a confession of guilt...Or was it?
LOLOLOLOL...SURE!!!
FOR SOMEONE THAT CALLS themselve "smart". you SURE ARE PRETTY DUMB LETTING yourself GET SCAMMED SOO EASILY BY OBVIOUS LYING GRIFTERS...
SOO SAD!!
Having a live website doesn't mean that that the SEC is allowing them to continue doing business as usual. In fact, they aren't allowed to collect on their debts at lest until the SEC case is over.
DO you REALLY BELIEVE THAT IF AUCTUS WERE DOING ILLEGAL TRANSACTIONS AND SEC "SHUT THEM DOWN", THAT THEIR WEBSITE WOULD BE UP AND ACTIVE AND STILL DOING BUSINESS???
SILLY PATHETIC PUMPING MAMALUKE!!!
https://auctuscapitalinc.com/services/
IF you're TALKING TO ME. I'M NOT SIDING WITH ANYONE. JUST STATING THE FACTS!!!
I DEFINITELY DON'T HAVE ANYTHING GOOD TO SAY ABOUT LYING GRIFTERS SCAMMING NAIVE RETAIL THOUGH!!!
Check wdlf(decentral life, a.k.a social life network). they LOST using basile less than a year ago and had to pay attorney fees
And, once again, I wonder why you appear to be siding with the toxic lenders?
Oh really? Then cite those cases in which there were similar circumstances and the courts ruled that that precedent did not apply.
WRONG!!! EVEN IF SEC WINS. THERE'S APPEALS,, ETC...
ALSO, ONLY THING auctus WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DO IS CONVERT AT THE HIGHER RATES. THE 6 MILLION DOESN'T DISSAPPEAR....MAMALUKE!!!
WRONG! Should the SEC prove its case against Auctus (which is highly likely), it will make XERI's case against Auctus much stronger -- as it will help establish that XERI was just another victim of Auctus' illegal activities as an unregistered trader / broker.
LOLOLOLOL...
THAT'S DEFINITELY NOT ANY "PRECEDENT" AS MANY CASES AFTER THAT WHERE WON BY THE "TOXIC" DEFENDANTS....
SILLY PATHETIC PUMPING MAMALUKE!!!
OBVIOUSLY WASN'T TALKING ABOUT SEC. THE ONLY LAWSUIT THAT MATTERS IS xeri VS auctus...
FYI: In 2021, a significant precedent was established affirming that toxic lenders could be held accountable for their practices, particularly those that exploit small businesses. Since then, the SEC -- as well as private law firms, like Basile -- have won a number of similar cases.
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled against Ibrahim Almagarby and his company, Microcap Equity Group, LLC, in a case involving alleged deceptive lending practices. The court found that the company had engaged in predatory lending, violating both federal and state laws.. The decision emphasized the importance of transparency and fairness in lending agreements, making it clearer that lenders could face legal repercussions for misleading terms and conditions. This case has been cited in subsequent legal actions as a benchmark for challenging similar predatory practices in the lending industry.
The SEC doesn't use outside law firms like Basile to prosecute its cases against toxic lenders!
1.) As does every law firm.
2.) So they figured out how to direct and cater a case to their clients strongest claim and likelihood to win.
Xeriant chose well.
BTW, basile WAS THE FIRM THAT LOST MANY OF THEM...
Here are the facts: SEC has been actively prosecuting toxic lenders for operating as unregistered brokers or dealers. In recent years, the SEC has seen a notable increase in success with these cases. For instance, the SEC has won judgments in at least four civil cases against convertible note lenders who acted as unregistered dealers1. Additionally, several other cases have either survived motions by the toxic lenders to dismiss or have been settled.
Previously, the SEC faced challenges in these prosecutions due to the complexity of proving that these lenders were acting as dealers under the legal definition. However, a significant change came with a series of rulings that supported the SEC’s stance. One pivotal case was the ruling against Ibrahim Almagarby and his company, Microcap Equity Group, LLC, which set a precedent for future actions2. This ruling, along with others, has clarified the legal boundaries and strengthened the SEC’s position in court2.
The SEC’s recent victories have been bolstered by a clearer legal framework and more robust enforcement strategies, which have helped them successfully argue that these toxic lenders must register as dealers and comply with regulatory requirements.
Oh, really? I heard the SEC has been very successful recently in prosecuting toxic lenders. If you have recent examples of similar cases in which toxic lenders were unsuccessfully prosecuted for illegally operating as an unregistered traders/brokers, please provide details and sources.
TOTAL BULLSHIT!!! I KNOW FOR A FACT MOST ALL THOSE CASES ARE DISMISSED!!! NOT ONLY THAT. THE PLAINTIFFS HAVE TO REIMBURSE THE DEFENDANT/S FOR LEGAL FEES!!!
SILLY PATHETIC PUMPING MAMALUKE!!!
BTW: The courts have determined that toxic lenders which have been proven guilty by the SEC in similar cases must forfeit their illegal profits and cannot even recoup any unpaid loan balances from their borrowers!
Followers
|
101
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
33899
|
Created
|
12/26/12
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators SurgeGuy2.0 |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |