News Focus
News Focus
icon url

surfkast

01/16/25 10:42 AM

#131395 RE: NoMoDo #131394

OMG! Now movijg the goal posts. LOL
icon url

EmpressMonk25

01/16/25 10:44 AM

#131396 RE: NoMoDo #131394

This morning, someone used the term "handler," which I found amusing. Interestingly, "handler" might be a more fitting description than the phrase "skin in the game."
icon url

TenKay

01/16/25 10:52 AM

#131401 RE: NoMoDo #131394

Yesterday did chafe you didn't it. ;-)

I have answered the question BTW...

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175671040
icon url

EmpressMonk25

01/16/25 11:04 AM

#131409 RE: NoMoDo #131394

If counterfeit shares exist on a significant scale, which I believe to be a plausible situation. How would these shares be covered in practical terms? Would market makers (MMs) work to secure these shares for their counterparties discreetly, without triggering price movements that would raise regulatory concerns? Wouldn't it be crucial to prevent any volatile price action? This bid/ask activity you question NoMoDo remains unanswered.

I'm not even sure how you cover something that truly never existed. One might assume that covering could be achieved when diluted shares are added?

It's unlikely that any of us fully understands how such an issue would be resolved in a real-world scenario, particularly given that some question whether it occurs at all.
icon url

Huggy Bear

01/16/25 11:12 AM

#131414 RE: NoMoDo #131394

"Bashers need the stock to drop"

You excel at making up bullshit. You think I need the stock to drop for four years solid huh?

Y'all crack me up. Keep those sheep shearers sharp now.