News Focus
News Focus
icon url

fuagf

01/14/25 2:00 PM

#507608 RE: hap0206 #507607

hap0206, Exactly what of Trump's misinformation are you relying upon to say - "...in the LA fires they apparently were not fully employed until after several days." Of course, since most anything is possible, what you say there could be true, but without a supportive link there is no reason to believe you.
icon url

sortagreen

01/14/25 2:23 PM

#507611 RE: hap0206 #507607

"an effort to get these fire suppression systems on the fires when they are just beginning and small -- in the LA fires they apparently were not fully employed until after several days."

Wanna let us in on what the voices in your head are telling you about that, dotard?
icon url

DesertDrifter

01/14/25 2:55 PM

#507616 RE: hap0206 #507607

The initial attack on a fire threatening a residential area is such that everything available is thrown at it, and automatic dispatch of move-up forces occurs. The military does not have fleets of aircraft sitting ready for initial attack on wildfires, as it would interfere with THEIR mission. Different chain of command, but they reinforce contract forces to maintain and escalate as needed and always help when asked. Military transports do not sit around with MAFF units on board, as they have other jobs to do. But when responding, they give it their all.

Hindsight is always wonderful on disasters.

The civilian water infrastructure is not designed to handle what you republicans are demanding of it in your "coulda shoulda woulda" blather. The cost of having such systems everywhere would never be borne by selfish republican greedmeisters. The only one I know of is in San Fransisco, where massive pumps are in place that can charge the hydrant system with seawater in extreme emergencies.

Maybe you could lead the charge in raising the taxes to have one installed in your city.
icon url

fuagf

01/14/25 2:56 PM

#507617 RE: hap0206 #507607

hap0206, Yours is clearly misinformation ..
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175663841 .

Not appreciated at all. And remember links are required from you in support of such assertions.

"I am hopeful that in the aftermath of these fires, there will be an effort to get these fire suppression systems on the fires when they are just beginning and small -- in the LA fires they apparently were not fully employed until after several days."

In your first words there, your attempt to attach a non-partisan human face to your misinformation fails miserably.