Replies to post #355888 on Digital Brand Media and Marketing Group Inc (DBMM)

[Topfuel]

That depends on your definition of Toxic.
 Why would the company not disclose where there financing is coming from?  
But expect people to buy shares with their hard earned money on a open traded market without clear transparency. 
Obviously a capital gains write off from someone. But wait 2025 is gonna be a banner year.

[THall]

DBMM currently has $3 million in toxic debt. I suggest doing some actual research and stop spreading lies and misinformation. If you are going to claim DBMM has no toxic lenders then post the terms of the LOI contracts. All you do is lie and cause more damage to existing shareholders. So if you are going to say they have no toxic lenders then back it up with some proof. Seems to me if the $3 million loan was not from a toxic lender then DBMM would have no problem disclosing the terms. Instead they hide that information from their shareholders. Why is that Poo*Pink?

"toxic debt" refers to any debt that a company does not have the funds to repay, meaning it is highly likely to default and is considered a significant financial risk for the lender as there is a low chance of recovering the fund

A "toxic lender" refers to a lender who engages in predatory lending practices, often targeting vulnerable borrowers with extremely high interest rates, excessive fees, and complex loan terms, essentially trapping them in a cycle of debt and making it difficult to repay the loan.

[Stock_Barber]

What are the repayment terms of the millions in funding from some mystery source that you call LTI's?

Yeah, we know... NONE OF SHAREHOLDER'S BUSINESS!

[Jetmek_03052]

LOL! Give it a rest.

Bashing is piece of cake with no facts and filings which prove otherwise .

Here's some factual content Poo - but wait - YOU will call it "Bashing":

1. DBMM LOST over a MILLION DOLLARS from its operations in the last fiscal year. This can be easily verified in the 10K.

2. DBMM's revenue stream in the fourth quarter of last year was $29,179. But they BORROWED $176,456 in that quarter! This can easily be verified in the 10K.

3. DBMM has not announced ANY new client signings since the end of fiscal year 2024. No new clients were added in the 1st quarter. We are now into the 3rd week of the 2nd quarter and no new client signings have been announced. So, the revenue stream of DBMM has NOT IMPROVED. If 2025 revenue "is expected to be the highest in DBMM's public company history"?? Then Digital Clarity will have to start signing on clients!! WHY CAN'T Digital Clarity SIGN ON CLIENTS??? After all, they have this wonderful "AI Stack" to give their clients!! LOL!

4. DBMM has consistently stated that they are going to "expand" into various cities in the US. They have named MANY cities in the updates they would expand into - yet the actual expansion has NOT EVER HAPPENED.

5. DBMM has stated for years that they will expand into the U.A.E and Asia. Yet expansion into those areas has NEVER been seen.

6. DBMM stated that the level up to the QB level would happen when the stock reached a price of $.01 and stayed there for 30 days. Yet they fail to mention that this will not happen until DBMM appoints independent directors to the Board or the Audit Committee (an OTCM REQUIREMENT). Currently, there are NO independent directors. IF DBMM reached $.01 TODAY, the OTCM would refuse the uplevel request.

DBMM is NOT "strong". DBMM is very weak actually - in its last 2024 fiscal quarter of operation, they borrowed a little over SIX TIMES what they took in revenue!!! I'll bet that when the 1st quarter 10Q of DBMM's fiscal 2025 year is published this coming month, similar revenue AND borrowing will be seen. Yes - this is opinion but how could it NOT be similar??? There have been no client signings announced!

These are FACTS and the numbers are taken from the AUDITED 10K! Still want to call these facts a "fictional narrative"? Anyone seeing these numbers will invariably come to the conclusion that DBMM is borrowing only to survive - not to "grow" (as you often claim).

[luvthemtrainz]

Poo, if you were to remove "bashing", "basher" and "bashers" from your vocabulary, you would verge on being a functional illiterate. If you're so high on the outfit, just stick to what you believe to be positives. IMO, of course.