DBMM currently has $3 million in toxic debt. I suggest doing some actual research and stop spreading lies and misinformation. If you are going to claim DBMM has no toxic lenders then post the terms of the LOI contracts. All you do is lie and cause more damage to existing shareholders. So if you are going to say they have no toxic lenders then back it up with some proof. Seems to me if the $3 million loan was not from a toxic lender then DBMM would have no problem disclosing the terms. Instead they hide that information from their shareholders. Why is that Poo*Pink?
"toxic debt" refers to any debt that a company does not have the funds to repay, meaning it is highly likely to default and is considered a significant financial risk for the lender as there is a low chance of recovering the fund
A "toxic lender" refers to a lender who engages in predatory lending practices, often targeting vulnerable borrowers with extremely high interest rates, excessive fees, and complex loan terms, essentially trapping them in a cycle of debt and making it difficult to repay the loan.