News Focus
News Focus
icon url

antihama

12/14/24 2:32 PM

#737556 RE: polska #737545

I think you hit the nail on the head.

You can't be a science guy and completely ignore the elegance of the DCVax platform; unless, of course you are paid to do so!

icon url

iclight

12/14/24 3:42 PM

#737575 RE: polska #737545

Numerous oncologists including Stupp have questioned the platform and the P3. They want actual proof of efficacy not the mess the P3 became. They are science guys by any metric.
icon url

exwannabe

12/14/24 3:54 PM

#737583 RE: polska #737545

You can't be a science guy and completely ignore the elegance of the DCVax platform; ...


Please tell me how it is any more elegant than all the other ATL-DCs that have been used in trials. They all take the PBMCs from the patient along with the tumor lysate. Differentiate the PBMCs into DCs and then activate/mature them in presence of the tumor lysate.

The only visible distinguishing feature from most I see is that NWBO has been making a single batch and freezing it for the individual doses, while others I have seen (including all UCLA combo trials) make one batch per dose and use fresh. That clearly is an economic improvement for NWBO as there is a huge cost per batch. But far from clear how it compares clinically and hard to believe it works better than fresh.