News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Hosai

12/02/24 4:12 PM

#475825 RE: 12x #475824

EMA pretty much approved Lecanumab on a post-hoc (obv only for a sub-set of patients).
icon url

boi568

12/02/24 4:14 PM

#475826 RE: 12x #475824

I agree that we can't rely upon our amateur analysts as we would for professionals.

As for your placebo point, the proper comparison, as was done in the case of the S1R WT and its mutation, is to compare against comparable populations in the placebo group and not the combined set placebo you are referencing.
icon url

Steady_T

12/02/24 4:17 PM

#475827 RE: 12x #475824

If you are going to compare the remaining population of the ITT with the COL24A1 subtracted to the placebo group, you need to subtract the COL24A1 from the placebo group to get a fair comparison.
icon url

BAR123

12/02/24 5:11 PM

#475831 RE: 12x #475824

I think that you can count on a confirmatory trial with the EMA. That is not so bad as they have 5 years to get it completed I believe and they will be selling the drug the entire time. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-investigation-subgroups-confirmatory-clinical-trials_en.pdf