Replies to post #133830 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[chazzy1]

Very good observations, VVVVVV.

[ORCA]

LOL.THE PPS SPEAKS VOLUMES WITH THE ANTITRUST GARBAGE.IF IT WAS GOOD NEWS.THE STOCK WOULD BE AT MINIMUM .02.BUT SINCE IT IS GARBAGE ARE AT ALL TIME LOW LIKE????LOL.
FOR ME NO PROBLEM.I WILL KEEP TRADING IT FOR A CAN OF SODA.AND IF IT GOES TO ZERO??NO BIG DEAL.ON MY 6,5 MILLION SHARES.I WILL MAKE THE MONEY BACK ELSE WHERE.BUT AS LONG AS I MAKE PROFIT A CAN OF SODA.I WILL BE HERE.TO FLIP THIS THING.

[Dontnosheet]

They are competing in the market??? WTF are you smoking??? They have NEVER competed in this market.

[fung_derf]

I read this letter from your CEO and it makes no sense....

https://www.ceocfointerviews.com/voippalantitrust0824.html

How is, forcing another company to give their users a discount on their bill, making money for the shareholders here?

It's like Malak saying, I think I'll eat a peanut butter and jelly sandwich....so I hope the kids in Biafra aren't hungry any more. Anything he is doing, is not designed to help the shareholders here at all. You all serve the purpose of paying his day to day expenses.....and being happy about it!
Antitrust cases are about rewarding lawyers and to a lesser degree, the users of the product. Show me a case where a third party competitor profits......

can a third party competitor be rewarded from an antitrust case?
AI Overview
Learn more
…
No, under most circumstances, a third-party competitor cannot directly be "rewarded" with financial compensation in an antitrust case, as the primary purpose of antitrust laws is to protect consumers and directly harmed parties, not to benefit competitors who may have indirectly gained from anticompetitive behavior; however, they may benefit from the market disruption caused by a successful antitrust lawsuit against a dominant player, allowing them to gain market share.

Too bad VPLM has no market share of anything.

[drumming4life]

Did you read Exhibit A?  Feels like the company & a few cheerleaders got gutted in that letter.  I'm sorry i read the letter. Between the antitrust complaint where they admitted to knowing there was a "minuscule" chance of success in proving  infringement & the legal ass whipping in the letter, I'm very concerned about the price ever moving past .05!   

For reference, here's paragraph 2 of the preamble from the complaint...
"What these corporations label as “litigious” is, in fact, VoIP-Pal’s desperate fight for survival. Faced with the prospect of watching its patented technology languish unmonetized or engage in protracted, financially devastating litigation, VoIP-Pal has chosen the latter, albeit with minuscule chances of success under the current legal framework. These tech giants have leveraged the flaws in the America Invents Act (AIA) to their advantage, relying on multiple IPR challenges to tie VoIP-Pal up in court and bleed the company of its resources.”