Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[fung_derf]

I read this letter from your CEO and it makes no sense....

https://www.ceocfointerviews.com/voippalantitrust0824.html

How is, forcing another company to give their users a discount on their bill, making money for the shareholders here?

It's like Malak saying, I think I'll eat a peanut butter and jelly sandwich....so I hope the kids in Biafra aren't hungry any more. Anything he is doing, is not designed to help the shareholders here at all. You all serve the purpose of paying his day to day expenses.....and being happy about it!
Antitrust cases are about rewarding lawyers and to a lesser degree, the users of the product. Show me a case where a third party competitor profits......

can a third party competitor be rewarded from an antitrust case?
AI Overview
Learn more
…
No, under most circumstances, a third-party competitor cannot directly be "rewarded" with financial compensation in an antitrust case, as the primary purpose of antitrust laws is to protect consumers and directly harmed parties, not to benefit competitors who may have indirectly gained from anticompetitive behavior; however, they may benefit from the market disruption caused by a successful antitrust lawsuit against a dominant player, allowing them to gain market share.

Too bad VPLM has no market share of anything.