Danish - You have a high tolerance for cringeworthy ignorance. You're trying to reason with those who want to be right, and not those who care for the truth. I've tested the depths of cognitive dissonance here many times. It's often you'll find fact-check, as a means to shut down debate, or use as a surrogate for the kind that I'm a proponent of. Namely, that rises to the level a court would find admissable as evidence. How do you stake a claim on an intro, when no genuine interest for the supporting data is welcome, but instead met with deletion, insult, or some lazy response that satisfies their own ignorance over reality?
Keep in mind, society has reached a point where beliefs can not, for the most part, be overcome with overwhelming truth.