Replies to post #133494 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[sunspotter]

“ was told that no one has been served yet. That spoke volumes to me.”

Yeah, me too.

They’re never going to be served because the countersuits for malicious and frivolous prosecution would crush them.

It’s just more fodder for VPLM’s social media pimps.

[chazzy1]

Thank you InvestorinAZ. Your single post has cleared the air of much of the confusion and misinformation that has been circulating. To be fair, a certain amount of speculation is to be expected in the absence of any substantive information from legitimate sources. Your post made even more clear certain points that were either missing or not emphasized enough in the press release.

[Dontnosheet]

Richie must truly love sheep like you, LMAO!!

[chazzy1]

I would like to thank InvestorinAZ for clearing up one misunderstanding that I had concerning the recent dismissals without prejudice of the two cases involving T-Mobile and Verizon. I had erroneously assumed that those were the same cases that were awaiting a response from Judge Albright to a motion for reconsideration.
I was elated to learn that those two cases have not only NOT been dismissed, but that there is confidence within the VoIP-Pal team that the reconsideration will go our way.

Then we still have the Amazon RBR case. When you add all of this up, it is very exciting, and I think that the selling yesterday was a kneejerk reaction to misunderstood information. JMHO.

[thelimeyone]

VPLM

A shockingly bad PR is the cause of this latest price fiasco.
Rich/management need to immediately address this with another PR
explaining this because ATM only IR/management and some Ihub shareholders are even aware
of the real situation. If they do not rectify this the stock price will tank further. Anyone who has
any standing with Rich should talk to him ASAP. This was a needless travesty, talk about shooting yourself in the foot.
Crappy PR's are the last thing we need right now.

tlo

[fung_derf]

And this from the person who has said many times never say anything negative on the board.
So, explain this to me....two years ago they had determined they had a better way to attack through antitrust, but decided not to use it?? They preferred to waste all YOUR money on attorneys than to take the more expedient route? Does this make more sense to you? If that's the case, why is Rich and his brother filing a lawsuit in D.C.? And what company do you know that actually has the IR involved in any board meetings? IF you spoke to Rich (and who cares if you did), not only is he only passing along hearsay, BUT, he has proven he only gives shareholders one sided stories.
Oh, and BTW, a case that is voluntarily dismissed OF COURSE will be without prejudice! A Judge wouldn't have to make any ruling. BUT if it ain't winning now with the most liberal of Judges and now there is precedence, why would it later? Not to mention all the defendants attorneys fees YOU will get to pay.
When are you, and others, going to publicly admit that the time needed is just to allow them to sell more shares? The end was near, so they came up with the new playbook.
Lastly, why weren't you buying at .007? For a hundred bucks you could have had 14,000 shares! Are you sure you believe?
IF you believe you were harmed by a class action suit as shareholders, it would be much smarter for YOU to contact an attorney to be the lead plaintiff. After all, if you believe the company could win a case, then you as a shareholder have every right to file first. Do you expect the company to ask you to be included?