And this from the person who has said many times never say anything negative on the board.
So, explain this to me....two years ago they had determined they had a better way to attack through antitrust, but decided not to use it?? They preferred to waste all YOUR money on attorneys than to take the more expedient route? Does this make more sense to you? If that's the case, why is Rich and his brother filing a lawsuit in D.C.? And what company do you know that actually has the IR involved in any board meetings? IF you spoke to Rich (and who cares if you did), not only is he only passing along hearsay, BUT, he has proven he only gives shareholders one sided stories.
Oh, and BTW, a case that is voluntarily dismissed OF COURSE will be without prejudice! A Judge wouldn't have to make any ruling. BUT if it ain't winning now with the most liberal of Judges and now there is precedence, why would it later? Not to mention all the defendants attorneys fees YOU will get to pay.
When are you, and others, going to publicly admit that the time needed is just to allow them to sell more shares? The end was near, so they came up with the new playbook.
Lastly, why weren't you buying at .007? For a hundred bucks you could have had 14,000 shares! Are you sure you believe?
IF you believe you were harmed by a class action suit as shareholders, it would be much smarter for YOU to contact an attorney to be the lead plaintiff. After all, if you believe the company could win a case, then you as a shareholder have every right to file first. Do you expect the company to ask you to be included?
Just my opinion, of course.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
