News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Zadie420

10/12/24 1:44 AM

#725642 RE: JerryCampbell #725637

Not true. Both are wrong. I vividly remember AAPL dropped to $5 or little lower back in 1990s or early 2000. Actually this was one of the reason Steve Job had to resign.

The numbers does not matter here. What he was trying to say that Apple was trading very low compared to its current value before it took off. It had ups and downs in last 30; years.
icon url

Kap10jak

10/12/24 8:47 AM

#725668 RE: JerryCampbell #725637

If you pay 1 dollar for a stock and it splits the next day you have 2 shares and you only paid a dollar so each share cost you fitty cent. So to that guy you need to divide the original cost by number of splits to find out what he paid per share for all the shares he now owns.
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

ATLnsider

10/12/24 10:30 AM

#725672 RE: JerryCampbell #725637

Jerry, this is a lie. Apple traded as low as $0.04 in June and July 1982. Go to this link to see all Apple’s historical prices, and scroll down to June and July 1982:

https://www.digrin.com/stocks/detail/AAPL/price


Bullish
Bullish
icon url

GoodGuyBill

10/12/24 12:38 PM

#725693 RE: JerryCampbell #725637

Look at the years 1981 through 1985, there were many days where Apple's pps opened and/or closed under $1. Your statement actually proves my point: The PPS at a given point in time cannot be the sole variable one looks at in examining the investment value of a company. Thank you. You rightly included stock splits and multiplier. It is appropriate to state those facts. But Mr. moderator, why won't you comment on the variables naysayers intentionally ignore with this same vigor? Your vigor is misplaced. Does it reveal you true stance on NWBO?

Funny how NWBO naysayers harp solely on the .30 pps of a pre-market company but absolutely ignore the efficacy of DCVax (the ONLY real treatment for all tumor-based cancers), automated/infinitely scalable manufacturing, protective patents, and demand that will be insatiable, once DCVax is approved. Some of these naysayers will actually (and foolishly) deny these points.