Nice attempt at deflection " a classic example of third parties jumping in the middle of a conversation unaware of previous dialog" but you asked a third question besides the two in the post I responded to.
Two of your questions were “ What criminality are you referring to - the one person who texted the real estate agent regarding the project? What else do you believe was criminal supporting a “level of open criminality”?.
Which I wasn't responding to.
The one I responded to was:
"Do you have data to share in support of your opinion? If so, please share"
I provided the data you requested.
As well as the DATA that the only way Campanella could make a claim of Tortuous Interference or criminal actively was committed was it Moss told him the contents of the e-mail threaten there relationship, Moss told him he felt threaten by the e-mail, Moss told him that when he tried to contact the writer of the e-mail Moss discover the writer was not apart of any legal authority and the writer of the e-mail false represented themselves as such.
If Moss did not make these complains KNOWN TO Campanella FROM THE PRIVATE E-MAIL MOSS RECEIVED we would not be discussing this topic as it would not have existed.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
