Sun Pacific Holding Corp (SNPW)

[wallstreet1231]

Your response, and snpw’s tweet, is a classic example of third parties jumping in the middle of a conversation unaware of previous dialog.

My response was to a post that the author changed/modified. It’s apparent he couldn’t justify his prior post and therefore it was amended. Note my post stated
“ What criminality are you referring to - the one person who texted the real estate agent regarding the project? What else do you believe was criminal supporting a “level of open criminality”?. These are the questions arising from the previously modified post. So no, your reply to my post does not address the questions raised.

These questions have yet to be answered, albeit from a poster that apparently couldn’t substantiate his claims so he modified his post. So you have jumped in the middle of the conversation I will give you a chance to answer the questions. .

What criminality was being referenced, was it only the person who sent the email to Moss etc? What else do you believe was criminal supporting the poster’s comment of a “level of open criminality” beyond the Moss email? What lies were being posted that was referenced in his previously modified post. The questions still remain.