So grow time has an inverse relationship to density? So, if after 24 weeks, NSI is producing smaller than average pacific white shrimp, it would be reasonable to infer that NSI CAN and IS growing in high densities. That means either a few shrimp in a very small container or ALOT of shrimp in a very large container. We know what the locations look like, so let's assume the latter. Does this mean survivability is actually quite high? Lots of reasonable inferences to be drawn; reduced growth rate, presumably due to growth in higher densities; larger containers in Lacoste and Webster City suggest lots of shrimp in large containers. Survivability sounds like a high percentage, or this wouldn't be a problem, right? If survivability was low, then density would be presumed to be less and growth rate not inhibited. Therefore, based on this limited info, drawing reasonble inferenences in reliance on known information and one would have to be hard pressed not to admit that circumstantial evidence supports that the tech works.
With that said, new dilemmas present and must be dealt with. How best to calibrate the system to address the inverse relationship? Are there other technologies which may be added to help address that inverse relationship?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
