He clearly has a number of but especially that other trial I identified as major conflicts not disclosed and he is like a frenemy. A person who cozies up to you, pretends to be your friend, but is only there to get ammunition to take you down. Can’t trust people like that.
And clearly their analysis is filled with false assumptions and fake “facts” that undermine and create a false impression of the research. It is unbelievable that a Harvard professor would engage in such activities but when you look around, over time, I have found that academia is quite cut throat and this kind of activity by seemingly distinguished researchers is far more common than you would think. It’s disgusting.