InvestorsHub Logo

hope4patients

11/26/23 12:44 PM

#650729 RE: Lykiri #650718

Wow! Sooo many errors with that article. Crazy that it was allowed to be published. A real credibility problem for that publication.

dstock07734

11/26/23 2:53 PM

#650758 RE: Lykiri #650718

It's shocking to see a Harvard professor making a mistake like this. Can we place trust in such kind of professors to educate the eager young minds of tomorrow in this country?

sentiment_stocks

11/26/23 3:04 PM

#650762 RE: Lykiri #650718

Oh… that’s a huge mistake! It’s expected that sometimes investors like ourselves may make mistakes (you don’t make the Lykiri… at least as I recall) when reading a data presenting article… perhaps we’re going too fast or we don’t know the difference between PFS and OS like ex (just kidding, ex… I’ve made my share of errors, too.. it’s just so fun when you make them!), but I do expect more from these doctors. It’s their profession, so they should be very careful when making claims that deride the work of their peers.

flipper44

11/26/23 3:08 PM

#650764 RE: Lykiri #650718

Yes, I was about to point that out as well. The Chen/Ling/Reardon/Chiocca SNO paper is a flea infested hit article written by people that were supposed to be furthering science, not obliterating it.

The Danish Dude

11/26/23 4:04 PM

#650781 RE: Lykiri #650718

I took this example and tweeted beneath their erroneous tweet. Thanks Lykiri.