News Focus
News Focus
icon url

loanshark007

11/24/23 2:28 PM

#331304 RE: Poo28 #331303

0hwOw, more incoherent nonsense
icon url

uber darthium

11/24/23 2:29 PM

#331305 RE: Poo28 #331303

LindaPoo, most companies ( not all ) but most companies have a GROSS profit. That is why it’s called “gross profit”. After that all other costs are included for “net profit”. Harvard didn’t teach you that ?

Did you remember the location of that sign in the elevator lobby with the brick wall ? I am still looking for it
icon url

otterman

11/24/23 3:06 PM

#331307 RE: Poo28 #331303

I dont care what bashers think.
Quite frankly I dont care what you think.
What I do care about is the useless, excuse machine that 'runs', and I use that term loosley, this company.
You can give your excuses and blow sunshine and rainbows like you do out your filings, and you can attempt to talk down to with your veiled retorts to anyone here, but you will never be successful doing things the way you do. 20 years of failures should have taught you something, but apparently not. So here you will sit trying to one up the complaint department that your so staunchly blame for you problems.
If youre not going to learn how to run a company, at least do us the favor and get out of the way.
icon url

THall

11/24/23 4:34 PM

#331309 RE: Poo28 #331303

DBMM has never 1 time shown a profit. Stop your damn lying

If it weren't for loans they would show very little revenue at all. Borrowed money is not considered revenue but thats how you like to cook the books and scam traders.
icon url

Stock_Barber

11/27/23 9:57 PM

#331541 RE: Poo28 #331303

10. Settlement with Asher at 50% discount.


You have posted this endlessly, hundreds of times!

Plaintiff extended financing to Digital Brand Media & Marketing Group, Inc. ("Digital Brand") on three occasions. On February 1, 2013, plaintiff obtained a Convertible Promissory Note for $42,500.00, upon which there is a principal balance of $5,000.00. Digital Brand executed a similar note to plaintiff for $37,500 on April 25, 2013, which balance remains unpaid. The third note for $32,500.00 was issued to plaintiff on June 5, 2013, and the principal balance is $32,500.00. Plaintiff seeks a judgment for $75,000.00 and an additional $37,500.00 as claimed lost profits plaintiff would have realized had the stock in lieu of cash been made available to them in accordance with the conversion notice.


5,000
37,500
32,500
75,000 Add 37,500 = $112,500

What was the settlement amount?

DBMM paid $65K in June 2018, following $25K initially for a total of $90K Are you calling Love*Stink a liar?

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=154081909

How is that a 50% discount exactly Poopy Pants?

This is where you change the subject or hide... as always!