News Focus
News Focus
icon url

edcoolidge

11/13/23 4:14 PM

#5210 RE: soma2022 #5209

Brilliant post! 💯
icon url

alertmeipp

11/13/23 5:00 PM

#5211 RE: soma2022 #5209

Pretty certain many big pharmaceutical will be willing to pay way more than 1.5 billions to get $RVNC. But it would be too low for RVNC to even consider. At least for now. There is forced liquidation going on. Things will change fast when fundamentals rule again
icon url

stocksrising

11/13/23 5:28 PM

#5212 RE: soma2022 #5209

Outstanding summation, much appreciated:)
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

boraborak38

11/13/23 5:57 PM

#5214 RE: soma2022 #5209

This kind of post is why I still use Investorshub. Thank you for taking the time to do this. You should be compensated by IH. :)
A couple of points:
I have said that Foley did a couple things right.
1. Raising equity when he did.
2. Getting a fixed rate on their debt.
And it’s a good point that the fear of upcoming potential competitors is really overblown. The amount of $$ that needs to be spent is formidable.
icon url

DewDiligence

11/13/23 6:48 PM

#5215 RE: soma2022 #5209

One question and a couple of comments…

Question: What is the source for your statement that Allergan “kicked the tires” between 2014 and 2016?

Comment: You said,

…soon after 2014 IPO the transdermal drug candidate failed and Revance moved quickly to develop injectable drug candidate…

Actually, RVNC was developing both the transdermal (RT001) and injectable (Daxxify f/k/a RT002) products simultaneously, although RT001 came first. RVNC dropped RT001 in Jun 2016, which I viewed as a positive development (#msg-123277118).

Comment: Nobody I know believes the real reason for Dan Browne’s firing was his personal conduct (“HR issues”).

Thanks for posting a capsule summary of RVNC’s history. It should be very helpful for investors and prospective investors who haven’t followed the company since way back.
icon url

soma2022

12/10/24 11:48 AM

#8990 RE: soma2022 #5209

Revance History and Where We Stand (My post from Nov 2023 is linked here: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=173214109)

For what it is worth: EV back in Nov 2023 was $650M and EV of current TO is around $585M at Tender price of $3.10 and 105M shares, $427M debt, and my estimate of $165 to $170M cash at year end.

I am very surprised by the significantly lowered price and disappointed.

25 years of human work/effort to get here and develop a differentiated Neurotoxin that is superior on a price/performance/duration basis. Zero approval risk. Over $1B invested to get here, now approaching year 2 post commercial launch with continued and significant market uptake and injector growth while gradually closing in on the more rapid upswing phase of their growth curve from 2026 to 2030. I estimate forward 12 month Daxxify sales of over $150M (despite the transition to Crown) and over $140M annual sales of RHA past 12 months at 60 to 65% GMs. Sales force and mid levels being right sized and messaging and training and injection patterns getting optimized and perfected with high satisfaction rates for Daxxify and strong word of mouth. The product works well! Then add in the potential of therapeutic revenue once they have cash to restart trials in spasticity and support the CD launch in 2025 onward.

Crown is paying 60% below invested capital on a real basis while saving over 10 years of human drug development capital. Backing out the value of the RHA agreement, I feel Crown effectively paid around $400M for Daxxify. Let that sink in, and they have over $1B in carry forward losses on the books.

For a new NT competitor to come along and compete against Revance, they will have to spend over $1B in drug development costs and need at least 10 years to get to where Revance is today and you can simply buy Revance today at less than half that price fully de risked.

The implications are significant, and the Daxxify story is far from over. If anything, Daxxify just gained even more superiority on a cost/performance basis because of this. Kudos to Crown and their PE backer. This will go down as a master class in Vulture capital. A private Crown with no reporting requirements, running much leaner than Revance ever did, and having acquired their NT at 30 cents on the dollar on a real basis will wreak some havoc on the $2.5B US Neurotoxin market. For Allergan, Galderma, Evolus, Merz, etc to sit idly by and allow this acquisition at such a low price will come back to haunt them in ways they have not yet considered. Crown will almost certainly cannibalize pricing in the coming years. I predict that a $400M Daxxify acquisition price today will destroy over $150M a year in profit margins for the entire US NT market in the coming years. For this reason, Allergan and the others should have made sure to force Crown to pay up. The original $6.66 TO price = EV: $950M, IMO was the right price to keep Crown from causing too much damage to industry pricing.

I see Crown growing their Daxxify business over the next 2 to 3 years and then taking the company public again at a value 3 to 5x greater. Congratulations to the Crown team.

Though I am not optimistic, now that the low ball offer of $3.10 has printed, perhaps we get a competing bid from someone from a defensive strategy. Allergan paid over $2B for Coolsculpting and Kybella and those products had no significant market potential. Daxxify at this price to Crown stands to harm Allergan and the other NT cos significantly.