News Focus
News Focus
icon url

underpar71

11/06/23 9:36 AM

#645472 RE: Jackxkr #645470

Sad, but a lot of it is true. And, because of the nonsense from LP and NWBO mgmt, there is no trust on the Street. Who is the author of this hit piece?
icon url

learningcurve2020

11/06/23 9:55 AM

#645479 RE: Jackxkr #645470

BRAVO!!! Will some party please get to the bottom of it!

https://academic.oup.com/neuro-oncology/article/25/4/631/6958519?login=false
icon url

FeMike

11/06/23 10:30 AM

#645487 RE: Jackxkr #645470

Woof. Some very fair criticism, but also from this article:

Because of a crossover design, they couldn't really use the original placebo arm so they had to use "external controls", which basically means they could make up whatever they wanted



Talk about a complete and utter lack of understanding of ECA's and data. Make up whatever they wanted? This is just blatant and intentional misinformation.
icon url

Margin Buu

11/06/23 10:33 AM

#645489 RE: Jackxkr #645470

Silly deceptive article.

It states “post hoc retrospective analysis” when the change was done blinded and agreed to by the regulators. What a rag that article is. Just trying to take the heat off some political science majors?

MHRA approval here we come!!
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

DrHigh

11/06/23 10:42 AM

#645491 RE: Jackxkr #645470

this is just outrageously false:

Several months went by and nothing. You actually have to fast forward an additional 3.5 years to get to the actual data lock! By then, almost everyone in the trial was already dead for quite some time.



A fat tail stuffed with dead people? folks are living and the combo trial data will put a nail in the naysayers coffin. But the article accurately points out the history of lies. we are likely going to have another rugpull at the end of this month when we still have no word of an application which will not help with their lack of credibility.