News Focus
News Focus
icon url

ButtersOnARoll

10/25/23 12:35 PM

#125073 RE: prophet2 #125072

Oh really!

Do you know the contents of all of this and what it takes to respond to and knock it all down? AND, this is just a fraction of it:

219 motion Sealed Motion - Patent Cases only Wed 10/04 9:15 PM
Sealed Motion FOR SANCTIONS BASED ON VOIP-PALS VIOLATION OF THE COURTS ORDER DATED FEBRUARY 23, 2023 by T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Smith, Melissa)
Att: 1 Exhibit A,
Att: 2 Exhibit B,
Att: 3 Exhibit C,
Att: 4 Exhibit D,
Att: 5 Exhibit E,
Att: 6 Exhibit F,
Att: 7 Exhibit G,
Att: 8 Exhibit H,
Att: 9 Exhibit I,
Att: 10 Exhibit J,
Att: 11 Exhibit K,
Att: 12 Exhibit L,
Att: 13 Exhibit M,
Att: 14 Exhibit N,
Att: 15 Exhibit O,
Att: 16 Exhibit P,
Att: 17 Exhibit Q,
Att: 18 Exhibit R,
Att: 19 Exhibit S,
Att: 20 Exhibit T,
Att: 21 Exhibit U,
Att: 22 Exhibit V,
Att: 23 Exhibit W,
Att: 24 Proposed Order

misc Sealed Document - Patent Cases only Mon 07/03 8:55 PM
Sealed Document: RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION of143 Sealed Motion MOTION TO STRIKE AND EXCLUDE PORTIONS OF T-MOBILES EXPERT INVALIDITY REPORT AND EXPERT TESTIMONY FOR FAILURE TO MEET APPLICABLE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS by VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. by T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Smith, Melissa)
Att: 1 Affidavit N. Hamade,
Att: 2 Exhibit A,
Att: 3 Exhibit B,
Att: 4 Exhibit C,
Att: 5 Exhibit D,
Att: 6 Exhibit E,
Att: 7 Exhibit F,
Att: 8 Exhibit G,
Att: 9 Exhibit H,
Att: 10 Exhibit I,
Att: 11 Exhibit J,
Att: 12 Exhibit K,
Att: 13 Exhibit L,
Att: 14 Exhibit M,
Att: 15 Exhibit N,
Att: 16 Exhibit O,
Att: 17 Exhibit P,
Att: 18 Exhibit Q,
Att: 19 Exhibit R,
Att: 20 Exhibit S,
Att: 21 Exhibit T,
Att: 22 Exhibit U,
Att: 23 Exhibit V,
Att: 24 Proposed Order

175 misc Sealed Document - Patent Cases only Mon 07/03 8:44 PM
Sealed Document: RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION of141 Sealed Motion FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INVALIDITY FOR PRIOR ART PUBLIC USE AS TO U.S. PATENT NOS. 8,630,234 AND 10,880,721 by VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. by T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Smith, Melissa)
Att: 1 Affidavit N. Hamade,
Att: 2 Exhibit A,
Att: 3 Exhibit B,
Att: 4 Exhibit C,
Att: 5 Exhibit D,
Att: 6 Exhibit E,
Att: 7 Exhibit F,
Att: 8 Exhibit G,
Att: 9 Exhibit H,
Att: 10 Exhibit I,
Att: 11 Exhibit J,
Att: 12 Exhibit K,
Att: 13 Exhibit L,
Att: 14 Exhibit M,
Att: 15 Exhibit N,
Att: 16 Exhibit O,
Att: 17 Exhibit P,
Att: 18 Exhibit Q,
Att: 19 Exhibit R,
Att: 20 Exhibit S,
Att: 21 Exhibit T,
Att: 22 Exhibit U,
Att: 23 Exhibit V,
Att: 24 Exhibit W,
Att: 25 Exhibit X,
Att: 26 Exhibit Y,
Att: 27 Exhibit Z,
Att: 28 Exhibit AA,
Att: 29 Exhibit AB,
Att: 30 Exhibit AC,
Att: 31 Exhibit AD,
Att: 32 Exhibit AE,
Att: 33 Exhibit AF,
Att: 34 Exhibit AG,
Att: 35 Exhibit AH,
Att: 36 Exhibit AI,
Att: 37 Proposed Order

159 misc Sealed Document - Patent Cases only Fri 06/30 6:55 PM
Sealed Document: OPPOSITION TO VOIP-PALS MOTION TO STRIKE AND EXCLUDE EXPERT ARGUMENTS REGARDING NON-INFRINGEMENT THEORIES AND NON-INFRINGING ALTERNATIVES by T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Smith, Melissa)
Att: 1 Appendix,
Att: 2 Exhibit A,
Att: 3 Exhibit B,
Att: 4 Exhibit C,
Att: 5 Exhibit D,
Att: 6 Exhibit E,
Att: 7 Exhibit F,
Att: 8 Exhibit G,
Att: 9 Exhibit H,
Att: 10 Exhibit I,
Att: 11 Exhibit J,
Att: 12 Exhibit K,
Att: 13 Exhibit L,
Att: 14 Exhibit M,
Att: 15 Exhibit N,
Att: 16 Exhibit O,
Att: 17 Exhibit P,
Att: 18 Exhibit Q,
Att: 19 Exhibit R,
Att: 20 Exhibit S,
Att: 21 Exhibit T,
Att: 22 Exhibit U,
Att: 23 Exhibit V,
Att: 24 Exhibit W,
Att: 25 Proposed Order
Bullish
Bullish
icon url

nyt

10/25/23 4:20 PM

#125079 RE: prophet2 #125072

Lolol......you just took the words right out of my mouth. I was just about to post another monkey wrench and you saved me the trouble... It is however, important and not as trivial or ridiculous as many think, when these so called monkey wrenches are mentioned, because they potentially (beyond potentially for me) point to and bolster and support my belief that they (the monkey wrenches) are not random events but rather part of the whole nefarious scheme and plans that I strongly believe are the vplm reality. Every time, for years and years that I mention incoming monkey wrenches........that's exactly what happens. But please know thats not my main supporting happenstance. By and large, the main, and when I say main, I'm talking BIG BIG TIME.........reason for my strong belief in hanky panky farce of a company.....is.......because it's wholly against human nature and has never before happened........that such a humongous set of power and money potential........would be thrown under the bus in the 1st place, by vplm, when they took the patent troll poster boy route AND when all other companies and big investors in the world choose to just let such a limitless and untold fortune sit in the middle of the road to let any competitor to scoop it up at any moment. Makes no sense. Cannot be explained away...(somd have tried to but their "explanations" ALWAYS do not even begin to cover the bases of the vplm patents alleged power and value. That alleged amount of power and money is in a completely different league than any so called analogous comparison the explainers try to bring up, such as the Kearns wiper story, et al. There simply is no way to explain it away. I've looked at every possible angle. No such thing at the alleged level of the patents being all that, has ever happened to my knowledge. For every excuse or "reason" posters can come up with to allegedly explain away why the whole thing is legit, I can provide 10 critically thought out reason why it's a farce.
icon url

drumming4life

10/25/23 8:44 PM

#125089 RE: prophet2 #125072

Prophet…with all due respect, please double check the dates. TMus just filed their motion for sanctions on 10/11/23 for some crap they claim VPLM did and did not do back in February. Honestly feels like more desperation from TMus.

After all, it was TMus that hid their “expert witness” from VPLM until Hudnell challenged her sudden appearance & allegations in a TMus motion then fought for herto be deposed. Albright agreed and she was to be deposed. Don’t recall when or if it the deposition happened yet.

Hudnell’s opposition reply to the sanctions provided very compelling arguments as to why Judge Albright should deny the sanction request. Now we wait for Albright to decide.