Replies to post #342056 on Forwardly Inc (FORW)

[SF971]

The only way a 4.5 B float reverse merger with zero revenues like TSNP goes up 10,000+% is due to heavy stock promotion!

This costs thousands a week!

This is a dirty game, know what you own!

[I-Glow]

Hey noobie pumper boy who joined ihub on 07/07 and immediately started pumping the Sharp shells.

On every Sharp shell you only post about the naked shorting and oddly you never once post any facts to prove there is naked shorting.

Here you go pumper boy - a short primer to those clueless about any type of Shorting.

FTDs Reg SHO threshold

It means fails to deliver (FTDs) haven't reached the Reg SHO "threshold" level for the stock in question, in this case FORW.

The SEC adopted Regulation SHO to address failures in delivering securities within the two-day settlement period, promote market stability, and prevent the erosion of investor confidence in financial markets.

So post your proof of the FORW naked shorting.

IG

[I-Glow]

Here we go again more clueless nonsense about naked shorting. LMAO!

"Yes, hence why so many here don't understand how naked shorting is so rampant and essentially unregulated in the OTC markets. SEC just doesn't have the manpower to monitor/chase them all. Look at how long it's taken just to contact the foreign shareholders of SRNW.

The only way to expose naked share holders is to cause a change in the CUSIP number either through a merger, name change, etc."

This proves you are an idiot - a merger doesn't effect the open short positions - and you really are clueless if you think that a name change effects the open short positions because it doesn't.

Why hasn't Sharp filed a Corporate Action to change the CUSIP number?

IG
None of the Sharp tickers are being naked shorted - none are on the Reg SHO Threshold List.

Naked shorting is just more of your crazy nonsense. You joined ihub on 07/07 and immediately started pumping the Sharp tickers - and you are clueless about shorting.