This is the definition of related party transactions and when one person is the CEO of 4 companies and they are doing these swapping warrant transaction and in each case Sharp isn't held accountable by shareholders - and they can't do anything but sit and watch because Sharp controls the vote on all 4 of the tickers.
So don't start with the reset BS.
"Relax. It's called a 'reset'. He plans to issue the warrants again at an appropriate striking price. $0.32 was obviously way out of the money to be taken seriously."
How do you know he plans to issue warrants again. This is where securities fraud is involved - if the warrants were issued with a strike price of $0.32 to a independent company that Sharp didn't control - the warrants couldn't be returned. But they the Sharp tickers are organized - he is headed for big trouble.
What Sharp is doing is far worse than anything Adam Tracy ever did.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
