News Focus
News Focus
Followers 742
Posts 78438
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/01/2012

Re: MrSmith18 post# 341954

Monday, 08/07/2023 1:46:15 PM

Monday, August 07, 2023 1:46:15 PM

Post# of 344664
This is the definition of related party transactions and when one person is the CEO of 4 companies and they are doing these swapping warrant transaction and in each case Sharp isn't held accountable by shareholders - and they can't do anything but sit and watch because Sharp controls the vote on all 4 of the tickers.

So don't start with the reset BS.

"Relax. It's called a 'reset'. He plans to issue the warrants again at an appropriate striking price. $0.32 was obviously way out of the money to be taken seriously."

How do you know he plans to issue warrants again. This is where securities fraud is involved - if the warrants were issued with a strike price of $0.32 to a independent company that Sharp didn't control - the warrants couldn't be returned. But they the Sharp tickers are organized - he is headed for big trouble.

What Sharp is doing is far worse than anything Adam Tracy ever did.

IG

"Are you gonna pull those pistols or whistle Dixie?"

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y