Replies to post #180374 on Enzolytics Inc (ENZC)

[Dyno89]

Amen and well said. Definitely on the same page with you at this point. I don’t know why they can’t include a brief statement about the plan and direction of ENZC post SAGA deal.

Charles really needs to do a Q and A for ENZC shareholders. Or someone to moderate like the YouTube podcast things with Hicks were done. Anything that can give us more clarity. How else are we going to get specific answers? A lot of us have ALOT of money riding on how this plays out, I think we deserve some form of full transparency to give us a better idea where things are going.

[BonnieMac]

I understand. But again, my question remains, isn't Enzolytics Inc. supposed to serve in the capacity of a holding company over the whole shebang, the whole SAGA deal? , and if so, it would seem that Enzolytics Inc. would retain majority ownership of it, and hence has majority voting rights & thus can exercise great control over our PPS, which could skyrocket after this deal.

In other words, since Enzolytics is to act in the capacity as a holding company or parent company of this new Company, to be called Scientific Holdings, then ENZC would be in charge of everything. Scientific Holdings could just be a new Subsidiary of Enzolytics, i.e., be an "extra" benefit of it, and if this/its new Subsidiary succeeds, the PPS of ENZC could potentially skyrocket.

[MAGA_PATRIOT]

And in the meantime, as we once again wait for more clarity of whether we're (commons) getting screwed or not, it seems that the control of our pps will continue, and still not allowed to move up. So based solely on the new $450M price tag, we continue to sit undervalued by more than 300%.