Replies to post #208282 on The Question and Answer Board (IHUB)

[shajandr]

We defer to each reader to asses the veracity of what they read for themselves.

froidyun slippp?

[BullNBear52]

Well said.

[janice shell]

But why not think of some NEW things to do, rather than concentrate in imitating larger sites?

[ksquared]

Very well stated, Dave. Now...
Duck and cover. Incoming ! ! !

Proposed Rules Change - Need Your Feedback

[arachnodude]

Nothing in place for the obvious rule-benders that skirt the fringes of TOS, especially for those who have managed to become MODs and deliberately censor posts that don't jive with whatever agenda they're pushing? These MODs have found a way to weaponize the "system" and there seems to be no recourse.

[Zorax]

This is true for every platform, not just iHub. It's just easier for startups because they don't have a legacy to contend with.
Does legacy have to be trashed so one can act like a startup?
No malice intended.

And on the loosening of civil treatment. How can one say that a anonymous member calling another anonymous member a moron and idiot is the same as "I call my friends that all the time".'
Is it now okay to call a complete stranger a jackass just because they do it on twit in a throw away environment?

Please keep in mind that Ihub is an archive, not a 30 second mindless bloviate site.