More ridiculous claims by "Shareholders"
I am a shareholder and wish I would quit getting associated with the I love Linda crowd.
"Shareholders suggest that due diligence must be reasonable and pertinent. Read the filings."
Well, if this is the case, why is it constantly argued about the fact that DBMM is broke? Shareholders miss that part of the DD in the filings?
"The public company is a U.S. entity and Digital Clarity a 100% subsidiary of the parent , acquired and operating in the UK. Therefore all a growth digital marketing company requires is a Regus office, of which there are over 10,000 globally , is required for infrastructure. There is contractual staff there."
I agree, actually. A virtually bankrupt single member company doesn't need an office. As for growth, I guess when you are at the bottom, such as DBMM, there is only room for growth. I have zero clue what the 10,000 refers to because there are far more virtual offices globally than 10k. Even Regus boasts more. Guess it's more shareholder DD. The contractual staff is an answering service and mail forwarding service, hardly useful to a prestigious mega media giant lol.
Digital Clarity is a verifiable business but a micro company amongst giants. Hardly deserves millions in evaluation. Obviously, it is possible for them to get there. Maybe if they get above 10 employees...
"FYI: DBMM is a couple miles from Amazon, Google and many many headquarters. Welcome to New York City!"
FYI: You can throw a dart at a US map and hit a Google or Amazon interest. Suspiciously close proximity for a nemesis that defrauded you, though.
I was on Wall Street for a time. I am aware of the fact 17 miles in NY is like 100 normal miles. But if you ever spent time in this business, it is well known how small the investment world is.
Welcome to professional capital management in the US!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
