The Publishing Activity Committee (Wolfgang Wick, DE (Chair), Martin Taphoorn, NL (co-chair), Linda Dirven, NL, Francois Ducray, FR, Norbert Galldiks, DE, Monika Hegi, CH, Martin Klein, DE, Katrin Lamszus, DE, Simone Niclou, LU, Matthias Preusser, AT, Patrick Roth, CH, Roberta Rudà, IT, Felix Sahm, DE, Susan Short, UK, Riccardo Soffietti, IT, Martin Van den Bent, NL, Michael Weller, CH, Pieter Wesseling, NL) consists of editors that represent EANO in the following journals: Neuro-Oncology, Neuro-Oncology Practice and Neuro-Oncology Advances. The main tasks of the committee are to ensure scientific representation of EANO in the journals, providing a link between EANO and the journal publisher and promoting the publication activities within the EANO membership.
Susan Short : one of the co-signees of the JAMA “Comment”. Comment November 30, 2022 The need to report as-planned analyses and the weakness of historical controls Dr. Matt Williams, London Dr. Paul Sanghera, Birmingham Prof. Susan Short, Leeds Dr. Anup Vinayan, London Dr. Juliet Brock, Oxford Dr. Chris Herbert, Bristol Dr. Joanne Lewis, Newcastle Dr. Shaveta Mehta, Liverpool https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2798847
Every doctor who "signed" the Jama paper had a conflict of interest. Most were barely involved in the trial but were probably at the hospital where the trial happened and might have taken a patients blood so they wanted a publication credit. The majority of sites saw zero improvement based on simple math in their miniscule number of patients in the trial despite the cherry picking. The majority of sites in the trial had less than 5 patients. Many had one or two.
Patient level data, which they have for the P3 but won't release, would show this. Patient level data is also what LL said would be need to show efficacy, and the don't have that for the ECA.
Trying to discredit ACTUAL oncologists who disagree with this farce of a trial is character assassination pure and simple. It's all longs have since they actually paid Stupp for consultation and he said the data sucked, just like any doctor not shilling for the company by getting their little mention on the bullshit data paper.