News Focus
News Focus
icon url

allezlOM

11/04/22 10:39 AM

#263127 RE: Jetmek_03052 #263125

You'll have your answer when $DBMM CE will be removed off...STAY TUNED !
icon url

Harley16

11/04/22 10:40 AM

#263128 RE: Jetmek_03052 #263125

Not interested in wasting ANYTIME going over the exact same thing that has been answered 50 times over the last 2 years. So you can proceed to act like the conversation never happened and blatant proof to the contrary totally ignored.

All your wild dreams will be answered very soon. Maybe call the T A ;)
icon url

Fai 2

11/04/22 10:45 AM

#263131 RE: Jetmek_03052 #263125

I will answer lol. First it is hard to track NSS per SEC  see in quotes.

IF these naked shares exist? WHERE ARE THEY? Under someone's matteress?

"What is “Naked” Short Selling?

Naked short selling is unlawfully short selling shares that have neither been borrowed nor located. If sellers are engaged in naked short selling, then the volume of stock may be larger than the tradeable shares in the market, which can lead to sellers failing to deliver securities sold by the settlement date."


We know they cannot be in in U.S. trading accounts or else the DTCC would have to expose a share count in excess of the OS!

False I provide the above in quotes already with an on going case where Hedgies was naked shorting stock and no one knew. Until they made one big mistake. Here is the link.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.natlawreview.com/article/sec-brings-naked-short-selling-case%3famp

Use the link above to answer your last question the answer is there per SEC! Oh ma

If they are not in trading accounts, how EXACTLY does someone contact a broker and say, "I'd like to buy back DBMM to cover my short position"?????

I explained everything with a link from SEC and lawyers. "HOWEVER" LMAOO

Want to try explaining it???