Replies to post #737209 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Patswil]

Thanks Navy

I wonder how the defense can possibly argue this

[Achilles deFlandres]

Still , little or no discussion that the initial 10% was egregious at best. It also was intended to force all the funds into UST but they underestimated the earnings....

[Boat Shoes Warrior]

Boom! Crash! Bang!
I just hope this s easy to understand to the jury’s. Because even I am trying to stay on track. Boom!

[Robert from yahoo bd]

Professor Dharan gave Plaintiff Shareholders what has been missing in our legal quest for Justice for almost a decade. By so eloquently and painlessly explaining to the trier of fact what exactly happened here.

Almost all the board members and the long suffering Shareholders know exactly what took place here regarding the theft of our Economic Rights.

But Judges (and most lawyers) do not major in accounting and finance and terms like Deferred Tax Asset and the release of Credit Loss Reserves mean little or anything to them.

Here, Professor Dharan (with fantastic questioning by 'Professor' Hamish Hume) was able to educate the Jurors regular people on just how ridiculous the federal governments overreach is.

MIT and Harvard students are lucky to have him on the faculty and WE are fortunate to perhaps have found the missing link to Justice.

[Wise Man]

OUR NEGOTIATOR SLAMS THE CORRUPT FINANCIAL EXPERT.
He doesn't even know that both the 10% and the NWS dividends can't be called dividends, because they weren't paid out of distributable profit.
Let alone that a Prompt Corrective Action in any undercapitalized financial company, is the dividend suspended (Restriction on Capital Distribution), or the rest of the Law. For instance, what statutory provision authorized the security Warrant? Barred in the Fee Limitation, it can only be: to (iii) protect the taxpayer (collateral for the SPS)
Clearly, a guy paid by the hedge funds that hold JPS stocks.

THE DIVIDEND WAS IMPECCABLY SUSPENDED FOR EVERYBODY.

Corrupt financial experts try to explain the NWS div w/ logic,when it's a simple installment to a separate acct, like the FHLBs' 20% of profit.
The 10% Div installment increased the losses➡️Borrowing $ to pay it back➡️Circular.
Ain't no divs out of losses & restricted.#Fanniegate https://t.co/8uPCYGHODJ pic.twitter.com/2sntVHvKpS

— Conservatives against Trump (@CarlosVignote) October 24, 2022