The post you replied to had nothing to do with Pagman.
In a different post Pagman was mentioned, where aside from my own thoughts on warrants, it seemed similar to my thought. Which was: without NWS, Sp would be officially paid back and excess toward recap.
And the warrants being tossed was something I said SHOULD happen. I didn't mention Lamberth had the warrants in his case. This is a separate idea I believe could result from a favorable ruling in Lamberth or Rop and not necessarily because those courts ruled it to be so.
This is exactly why I say it's just my opinion.