News Focus
News Focus
icon url

M I A

10/03/22 2:03 PM

#733997 RE: kthomp19 #733989

The post you replied to had nothing to do with Pagman.
In a different post Pagman was mentioned, where aside from my own thoughts on warrants, it seemed similar to my thought. Which was: without NWS, Sp would be officially paid back and excess toward recap.

And the warrants being tossed was something I said SHOULD happen. I didn't mention Lamberth had the warrants in his case. This is a separate idea I believe could result from a favorable ruling in Lamberth or Rop and not necessarily because those courts ruled it to be so.

This is exactly why I say it's just my opinion.