InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 12
Posts 738
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/24/2021

Re: kthomp19 post# 733989

Monday, 10/03/2022 2:03:50 PM

Monday, October 03, 2022 2:03:50 PM

Post# of 797184
The post you replied to had nothing to do with Pagman.
In a different post Pagman was mentioned, where aside from my own thoughts on warrants, it seemed similar to my thought. Which was: without NWS, Sp would be officially paid back and excess toward recap.

And the warrants being tossed was something I said SHOULD happen. I didn't mention Lamberth had the warrants in his case. This is a separate idea I believe could result from a favorable ruling in Lamberth or Rop and not necessarily because those courts ruled it to be so.

This is exactly why I say it's just my opinion.