News Focus
News Focus
icon url

biosectinvestor

06/21/22 4:09 PM

#488796 RE: FeMike #488792

You presume to know their plans. I do not know their plans, I admit it is a possibility, but they are likely about to go revenue positive, and they have diluted my position by far more previously and yet I have been richly rewarded, so why would I complain. These are necessary moves to protect my equity. They need to maintain their cash, it would be good to uplist, but I am not convinced that they have decided to r/s and if they did, well, that’s a mathematical adjustment if the denominator not a change in ownership. The additional equity is needed to get them over the last hurdles. And in fact they could do a deal. No one knows, least of all you.
icon url

iwasadiver

06/21/22 6:07 PM

#488822 RE: FeMike #488792

The end will justify the means. They’re not concerned about money right now, it’s not an issue. It may be in a 6 months but not now.
icon url

skitahoe

06/21/22 7:16 PM

#488832 RE: FeMike #488792

Why do investors fear dilution when it's done at the right time and intended to build the company. I don't believe that the company would seriously dilute at todays prices. Once the trial is fully documented by the Journal and the company has ended the quiet period and brought the status of their activities over nearly the last two years up to date I believe our share price will be substantially higher. While I believe we'll authorize substantially more shares, not all that many will be needed to generate hundreds of millions of dollars.

Substantial dilution would be a possibility with an equity partnership, but it will add substantial value, and the stock should come up to roughly the price the BP partner agrees to pay. I believe that LP indicated that a buyout would be for no less than $20 billion, I would think she'd want essentially the same valuation on an equity partnership. I.E. if a BP partner were taking a 30% position in the stock they'd pay at lease $6 billion. It would make sense to me if half the shares were tendered by shareholders, and half were newly issued, so the company increased the outstanding share by 15%, and they'd have $3 billion to work with. I believe that nearly all shareholders would be happy with such a partnership and the share price it would bring.

I don't know it would go this way, but I believe it's the sort of arrangement that both the company and shareholders would be very happy with.

Gary