InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

highwayman4life

05/11/22 11:37 AM

#471020 RE: exwannabe #471018

Well Ex, you must know better than all of the actual medical experts in the field b/c apparently to them, the TLD from the DCVaxL trial is a "big win for the brain tumor patient community."


GLTA
icon url

hoffmann6383

05/11/22 11:41 AM

#471024 RE: exwannabe #471018

I'll trust the experts over a shareholder that touted fabricated checkmate data to attempt to put NWBO in a bad light, falsely insinuated Bigger and insiders were selling in an attempt to induce panic, pushed far flung criminal conspiracy theories and just 24 hours ago was claiming no TLD was being released at the NYAS



Have a good one Ex. By.

icon url

j e d

05/11/22 11:43 AM

#471026 RE: exwannabe #471018

how do you not get this? the control group was artificially strengthened because the weakest controls crossed over. by the end of the trial, only the controls that did not progress remained as controls. this is in essence cherry-picking the most resilient people to comprise the control group. and this is why that endpoint was found unviable, and why comparing blended to unblinded makes no sense.

by the end of the trial, any “controls” left were only those who are naturally hyper-resilient and lucky. this is no longer a control group.

a typical placebo patient would NOT experience what the remaining “controls” in this trial experienced. this is the whole reason for the endpoint change and ECA.

i’m redundant here but i’m not sure how else to explain it to you. usually you don’t go out of your way to lie but you keep hammering this point as if you don’t get it
icon url

flipper44

05/19/22 5:11 PM

#476255 RE: exwannabe #471018

I stand corrected on the Ltfu.

But Ex, that would mean out of 231 nGBM, there were only 5 lost to follow up over a 14 year trial.

And that would mean in the rGBM group, there were none lost to follow up at 24 months past recurrence.